Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 51

Thread: Help on speaker setup, PLEASE!!!!!!!!

  1. #31
    Who am I? HiJackZX1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    6,426
    Quote Originally Posted by soundman98 View Post
    they should pair up perfectly with the pdx 4.100.

    rms/max extremely simplified(there is more to figuring out these numbers than this, but for comparison purposes, these are the general rules):

    rms is the max wattage the speaker can take for a really long time
    max is the wattage that it can only take for very brief times, otherwise it will blow.
    AHHHHHHH, ok got it. That was easy. So if the PDX puts out 100 RMS, then these speakers taking up to 150 RMS will be more then fine.

    I have never ever heard of this brand though. I hear they make good home theater speakers too. The pricing is way lower then Alpine.
    HiJackZX1 w/ The Tobiathin Core PC system!

    ZOTAC GF9300-G-E
    INTEL E8200
    4 Gigs
    OCZ Vertex 2 SSD
    OPUS 320
    1 Lilliput, 1 MTSVO-SC K301, 4 VM70 screens, 1 Eonon 19in

    Starting Raspberry Pi multizone project.

  2. #32
    Who am I? HiJackZX1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    6,426
    Also since you know alot about this stuff, what is the difference between these two sets?

    http://www.cadencestore.com/ProductC...&idproduct=550

    http://www.cadencestore.com/ProductC...&idproduct=551
    HiJackZX1 w/ The Tobiathin Core PC system!

    ZOTAC GF9300-G-E
    INTEL E8200
    4 Gigs
    OCZ Vertex 2 SSD
    OPUS 320
    1 Lilliput, 1 MTSVO-SC K301, 4 VM70 screens, 1 Eonon 19in

    Starting Raspberry Pi multizone project.

  3. #33
    MySQL Error soundman98's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    on the border of northern IL/IN
    Posts
    5,512
    Caution: wrote a whole book and generalized 3-way setups! There is no standard 3-way setup...

    Quote Originally Posted by HiJackZX1 View Post
    Also since you know alot about this stuff, what is the difference between these two sets?

    http://www.cadencestore.com/ProductC...&idproduct=550

    http://www.cadencestore.com/ProductC...&idproduct=551

    i have been told that candence stuff is good, but have never heard it, so i can't say how good it is...

    both of the items you linked to are very close, the biggest difference is the overall setup-- the second one is a 3 way component set-- it uses a 6" midbass, a 2" silk dome mid and a inverted titanium dome tweeter-- similar(don't expect the same quality though) to focal speakers

    personally, i don't like metal dome tweeters, of any brand, and prefer silk dome tweeters. so to take my advise for, or against any speaker could force you into getting something that you don't like. i really hate giving speaker recomendations anywhere, because everyone has different musical tastes and expectations.

    i figure the best i can do is to provide the info on why certain speakers sound the way they do, so everyone can make a (slightly more)educated descision.

    the general ideas(again there is more to it than this, but it is a general idea) behind using a 3 way design is mostly to try to fill in the gaps of larger speakers--example: a 8" mid woofer is not going to be able to reproduce all frequencies all the way to a tweeters crossover point(usually around 2khz), so you would use a smaller mid(usually 4-5" size) to fill in where the 8" leaves off, and then the tweeter takes over after that.

    there are also 3 way designs that are setup to give the standard vocal range of singers to one specific speaker to try to minimize the effect of more than one source for the persons voice. and crossing over to a different speaker in the middle of teh vocal range can tend to add/remove certain, key things from the details of a singer.

    the candence unit looks like it falls in between both of these designs-- it is using a 6" midwoofer that utilizes a larger voicecoil for better midbass response, and the 2" mid is to give slightly better clarity in most critical area.

    some of the 3 way designs that i have heard tend to add to much midrange, and can fool you into thinking that the singers voice is deeper than it really is, which can give a false sense of realism.

    it also adds a 3 driver to a already complex setup-- if you though it was hard enough to add 2 drivers and get everyhing to line up properly, now you will have a 3rd that will handle +/-50% of the voice, and you must line that up just as carefuly as the other drivers...

    again, this is a internet forum, and i could have all my info completly wrong-if anyone notices any problems with it, feel free to correct me (after all, thats how we learn) and remember to listen at your on risk.

  4. #34
    Who am I? HiJackZX1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    6,426
    Quote Originally Posted by soundman98 View Post
    Caution: wrote a whole book and generalized 3-way setups! There is no standard 3-way setup...




    i have been told that candence stuff is good, but have never heard it, so i can't say how good it is...

    both of the items you linked to are very close, the biggest difference is the overall setup-- the second one is a 3 way component set-- it uses a 6" midbass, a 2" silk dome mid and a inverted titanium dome tweeter-- similar(don't expect the same quality though) to focal speakers

    personally, i don't like metal dome tweeters, of any brand, and prefer silk dome tweeters. so to take my advise for, or against any speaker could force you into getting something that you don't like. i really hate giving speaker recomendations anywhere, because everyone has different musical tastes and expectations.

    i figure the best i can do is to provide the info on why certain speakers sound the way they do, so everyone can make a (slightly more)educated descision.

    the general ideas(again there is more to it than this, but it is a general idea) behind using a 3 way design is mostly to try to fill in the gaps of larger speakers--example: a 8" mid woofer is not going to be able to reproduce all frequencies all the way to a tweeters crossover point(usually around 2khz), so you would use a smaller mid(usually 4-5" size) to fill in where the 8" leaves off, and then the tweeter takes over after that.

    there are also 3 way designs that are setup to give the standard vocal range of singers to one specific speaker to try to minimize the effect of more than one source for the persons voice. and crossing over to a different speaker in the middle of teh vocal range can tend to add/remove certain, key things from the details of a singer.

    the candence unit looks like it falls in between both of these designs-- it is using a 6" midwoofer that utilizes a larger voicecoil for better midbass response, and the 2" mid is to give slightly better clarity in most critical area.

    some of the 3 way designs that i have heard tend to add to much midrange, and can fool you into thinking that the singers voice is deeper than it really is, which can give a false sense of realism.

    it also adds a 3 driver to a already complex setup-- if you though it was hard enough to add 2 drivers and get everyhing to line up properly, now you will have a 3rd that will handle +/-50% of the voice, and you must line that up just as carefuly as the other drivers...

    again, this is a internet forum, and i could have all my info completly wrong-if anyone notices any problems with it, feel free to correct me (after all, thats how we learn) and remember to listen at your on risk.
    I didnt realize it was a 3 way setup.... i though it was a 2-way, that shows how much attention I actually pay. They have another speaker in the series but it looks like a monster. http://www.cadencestore.com/ProductC...&idproduct=235.

    I also like these and seem to be able to find them easily. Only thing is they handle exactly 100 RMS, which is what the amps put out also. I wanted to have the speakers rated alittle higher, just in case. Am I being to anal though? Should I just get 100 RMS speakers for the 100 RMS rate amp?

    Here is a link to those speakers. http://www.cadencestore.com/ProductC...&idproduct=231 The frequenct response doesnt seem to be as good though.
    HiJackZX1 w/ The Tobiathin Core PC system!

    ZOTAC GF9300-G-E
    INTEL E8200
    4 Gigs
    OCZ Vertex 2 SSD
    OPUS 320
    1 Lilliput, 1 MTSVO-SC K301, 4 VM70 screens, 1 Eonon 19in

    Starting Raspberry Pi multizone project.

  5. #35
    Low Bitrate
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    64
    That first set plays from 35Hz? Don't know about that.... you won't get any reasonable output of sub-woofer frequencies out of a 6.5" woofer @ 35Hz.

    I would not base my decision on that 35Hz at all, especially with that rubber surround not looking like a long-throw.

    I can't say nothing about Cadence, no experience with it, but again, just because they say it plays from 35Hz, it doesn't mean you will get good sound at that 35Hz. Most people play their woofers from 80Hz, and when people have them professionally installed in custom boxes, they may play them from 50Hz. So don't pick a set because they say it plays that low. It may, but not at reasonable loudness.

    As for RMS rating, it's better to have amp with greater RMS rating from a speaker, since woofers need more power to play lower frequencies, as the impedance of the speaker changes, depending on frequency it is playing. I have 80W RMS speakers hooked up to 300W amp, no problems at all. Actually, the sound quality is better now, before they were running of 150W. Just don't play sub-woofer frequencies with them, that may kill them.

  6. #36
    Newbie Sponge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    49
    All the feedback this far has been excellent.

    Quote Originally Posted by HiJackZX1 View Post

    I also like these and seem to be able to find them easily. Only thing is they handle exactly 100 RMS, which is what the amps put out also. I wanted to have the speakers rated alittle higher, just in case. Am I being to anal though? Should I just get 100 RMS speakers for the 100 RMS rate amp?
    Unless you listen to continuous low frequency pure sine waves at a nearly clipping amplitude, don't get too mixed up in the RMS thing. Treat it as more of a suggestion than a requirement and don't let it deter you from buying the speakers you want.

    If you cant mount your tweeters on axis (pointing at your head) in the kick panels, I would not put them there... I would have them on the dash. Second and third row seating would be fine with coaxials.

  7. #37
    MySQL Error soundman98's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    on the border of northern IL/IN
    Posts
    5,512
    Quote Originally Posted by digital79 View Post
    That first set plays from 35Hz? Don't know about that.... you won't get any reasonable output of sub-woofer frequencies out of a 6.5" woofer @ 35Hz.

    I would not base my decision on that 35Hz at all, especially with that rubber surround not looking like a long-throw.

    I can't say nothing about Cadence, no experience with it, but again, just because they say it plays from 35Hz, it doesn't mean you will get good sound at that 35Hz. Most people play their woofers from 80Hz, and when people have them professionally installed in custom boxes, they may play them from 50Hz. So don't pick a set because they say it plays that low. It may, but not at reasonable loudness.

    As for RMS rating, it's better to have amp with greater RMS rating from a speaker, since woofers need more power to play lower frequencies, as the impedance of the speaker changes, depending on frequency it is playing. I have 80W RMS speakers hooked up to 300W amp, no problems at all. Actually, the sound quality is better now, before they were running of 150W. Just don't play sub-woofer frequencies with them, that may kill them.
    good points.

    the freq response is 'supposed to be'(some manufacturers have different standards though) the -3db down points of the system. edit: after thinking about it, i believe that it is either -3 or -6db, but can't remember, so don't take this as a definate...


    the speakers do have a 3" voice coil though, so i say that they will be albe to play it-- for referance look at morel's supremo midwoofers-- the 6.5" is listed as having a usable range from 25-5000hz and also has a 3" voice coil, and costs wayyy to much . but its fs(free air resonance) is listed at 62hz, meaning you would probably cross the speaker over at about 75-80hz(to keep away from any resonance peaks). without seeing a datasheet for the other ones(), we are only guessing at what to cross them over at.

    morel listing:
    http://www.morelhifi.com/products/mo...s_supremo.html

    now, it is the end of friday, and i need to get home to continue my build and too many other projects-- everyone have a good weekend!

  8. #38
    Newbie Sponge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    49
    Haha, I thought those Cadence mids looked familiar!
    http://www.diymobileaudio.com/forum/...ce-cvl-6k.html

  9. #39
    Low Bitrate nalav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    97
    You generally don't need to concern yourself with the peak power. Get amps and speakers that are rated for close to the same RMS and you'll be fine.

  10. #40
    Who am I? HiJackZX1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    6,426
    OK..... So 100 RMS speakers will be fine. I did decide to do some reading since I had to work Saturday morning and from 2-4pm its dead. What I read is that alot of times companies will make Coaxials really cheap and thats why components are better. They say though that if you get a good pair of coaxials that they can actually sound better then components because all the sound is coming from the same area. Components will sound awkward if the tweeter and component are not installed correctly. So they recommend using coaxials that have a separate crossover. Does this information sound accurate? I guess I just really don't want to deal with separates, and I see high end coaxials even have the ability to aim the tweeter in the desired direction. They are pricey, but about the same as good components.
    HiJackZX1 w/ The Tobiathin Core PC system!

    ZOTAC GF9300-G-E
    INTEL E8200
    4 Gigs
    OCZ Vertex 2 SSD
    OPUS 320
    1 Lilliput, 1 MTSVO-SC K301, 4 VM70 screens, 1 Eonon 19in

    Starting Raspberry Pi multizone project.

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. My 2006 Scion xB (portable) Carputer setup! w/pics!
    By breaker021 in forum Show off your project
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 01-05-2007, 10:34 AM
  2. Speaker Blown???
    By 3onDubs in forum Car Audio
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 03-10-2006, 12:55 PM
  3. very strange speaker problem
    By saddlebacks in forum Car Audio
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-02-2006, 06:36 AM
  4. car amp with default speakers?
    By 273BeLow in forum Car Audio
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 03-30-2005, 12:53 AM
  5. help with my wifi setup?
    By ŠuTcH in forum Wireless Communications
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-06-2004, 12:10 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •