Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Some questions on the Alpine 701

  1. #1
    Variable Bitrate
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Bear, DE, USA
    Posts
    312

    Some questions on the Alpine 701

    I'm considering doing a fiber out on my carPC to an Alpine 701 processor, and I have some questions specific to the unit.

    1. I plan to, for a time, use it only for two-channel stereo, splitting the front tweets and mids and running a sub, and taking advantage of the time alignment features of the unit. Can the 701 collapse a 5.1 DD or DTS soundfield down to 2.1 channels, with separate front 1 and front 2 channels for time alignment (my tweets will be in a separate locale than my mids)?

    2. I plan to use a soundcard that sends an unmolested 44.1 kHz from CD sources...it is possible to do so from CD images or wave files on the hard drive, right? What about mp3's, do they necessitate a separate analog out? What about lossless compressed files? Is there any sense in worrying about resampling if the Alpine is doing things like time alignment once it recieves the signal? Does the Alpine need to resample in order to work its magic? If there is nothing to be gained by having a bit-perfect output on the carPC, I'd almost rather do a DD Live or DTS Live capable sound card, and having one digital output from the carPC to the processor.

    3. What are the advantages/disadvantages of using something like a Zapco amp with optical input/time alignment/crossover vice the 701 run into something like a JL audio monoblock and separate 2 or 4-channel? Is there a Zapco solution that has optical in and can be tuned for individual time alignment to tweets and midrange separately? How's Zapco's digital processing, EQ, and built-in crossover compare to the Alpine 701?

    FYI, the Rockford Fosgate processors are not an option, the time alignment in them is nowhere near precise enough for me, and having separate tweet and mid time alignment for my front stage as I expand to a 5.1 setup is important.

    Mods: Sorry to double-post, Could one of you delete my post in the "General Hardware" section?

  2. #2
    Maximum Bitrate 3onDubs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Anaheim Hills, Ca
    Posts
    847
    Quote Originally Posted by hithere View Post
    1. I plan to, for a time, use it only for two-channel stereo, splitting the front tweets and mids and running a sub, and taking advantage of the time alignment features of the unit. Can the 701 collapse a 5.1 DD or DTS soundfield down to 2.1 channels, with separate front 1 and front 2 channels for time alignment (my tweets will be in a separate locale than my mids)?
    Yes, it can do 2.1 and have seperate front 1 and front 2 channels (that is actually how i am using mine right now)

    2. I plan to use a soundcard that sends an unmolested 44.1 kHz from CD sources...it is possible to do so from CD images or wave files on the hard drive, right? What about mp3's, do they necessitate a separate analog out? What about lossless compressed files? Is there any sense in worrying about resampling if the Alpine is doing things like time alignment once it recieves the signal? Does the Alpine need to resample in order to work its magic? If there is nothing to be gained by having a bit-perfect output on the carPC, I'd almost rather do a DD Live or DTS Live capable sound card, and having one digital output from the carPC to the processor.
    Yes, one digital optical cable will transmit all sound (for mp3's, cd's, dvd's, etc.)....there is no need for analog cables.

    3. What are the advantages/disadvantages of using something like a Zapco amp with optical input/time alignment/crossover vice the 701 run into something like a JL audio monoblock and separate 2 or 4-channel? Is there a Zapco solution that has optical in and can be tuned for individual time alignment to tweets and midrange separately? How's Zapco's digital processing, EQ, and built-in crossover compare to the Alpine 701?
    Not sure about the Zapco, but you would be extremely hard pressed to find an amp or sound processor that could out-perform the H701. The H701 route would be my choice.

    FYI, the Rockford Fosgate processors are not an option, the time alignment in them is nowhere near precise enough for me, and having separate tweet and mid time alignment for my front stage as I expand to a 5.1 setup is important.
    In that case, I would do an active setup with the 701...you can't go wrong.
    PostCount++


    - SrCsTc's Bezel
    - Alpine W200/H701
    - ED Nine.2X
    - OZ Matrix Elites
    - ED Nine.1
    - Idmax 12's

Similar Threads

  1. Alpine
    By more mods in forum RR Skins
    Replies: 302
    Last Post: 04-10-2008, 06:34 AM
  2. Replies: 85
    Last Post: 07-09-2007, 05:44 AM
  3. Some questions on the Alpine 701
    By hithere in forum General Hardware Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-27-2006, 12:53 PM
  4. alpine skin questions
    By hakhawk in forum RR Skins
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 07-04-2005, 06:48 PM
  5. MP3 --> ALPINE head unit questions
    By WozzaWozza in forum Car Audio
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 06-09-2005, 11:46 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •