I have upgraded my CarPC to v 1.7RC3, from the good old v 1.4
So this is the first time I have the ability make some sound quality comparisons between the old and the new. Keep in mind I have used 1.4 for about 1 year in my car, and I know very well how it sounds with my equipment. I know sound percpetion is subjective, but I have a very good reference point.
I notice that sound quality is definitely different in RC3. I am using exact same settings as before: Flat EQ, No normalization, and volume levels are set to same (main and pre).
I would say that in 1.4 the bass response was better. It was richer, chest punding base where it mattered. I can't get that anymore with RC3, and I don't know why. Fiddling with the EQ helped a little for some albums, but then made other albums worse.
David, has the Sound processing changed since 1.4? In what way?
01 Jeep Cherokee Sport 4x4 Installed
M10000/512Mb/20GB, Lilliput 7", Holux GM-210
check your install. Something might have changed on the audio side of things. Amplifiers, speakers, connections, grounds, power, speaker wire, etc.
Hey Justin (and David)... I think I agree with you. I've been having issues with CF's embedded XM support, so I just switched back to AIMEE. There is a DEFINITE difference in how AIMEE sounds versus CF - like you say, the bass response is tighter outside of CF. There are obviously a couple of variables there, but given that the source is constant, I have to point and say it's the difference between the internal & external XM apps.
installs change over time, wires come loose and move. Connections rust and corrode.
Doesn't matter if it's worked great for 10 years. Things happen, ESPECIALLY in a car environment.
I think that the sound quality in rc3 is way better than rc2!
Asus A7N8X-VM - AMD Mobile Athlon 2400
512 Ram - 60GB HD - Opus 150w
Lilliput 7" - Rikaline 6010
[00000000000001100010-] 98% Completed
Check Out My Install!!!