Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: So whats next for me ?

  1. #1
    Low Bitrate
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    65

    So whats next for me ?

    I have been using the OBDPro hardware with some freeware softwares and so far it has proved to be a very good introduction to OBD. I think I am ready to take it to the next level.

    What I am looking for next is -

    • Speed - something better than 8hz(ISO). OBDPro gives me 8hz with ISO (timeout=32ms) but when I track 3 or more fast changing parameters, I can see it quickly becomes inadequate.
    • Better software/application - Logging, Dyno, Analysis(timing map!) all in one.
    • Universal compatibility (iso, vfw, can, etc..). IMHO paying for each one seperately is simply unacceptable in the year two thousand and seven, let alone impractical!

    Right now the only one I can see that fits the bill is Digimoto - unless I don't know of others. I still have to find out a few things about it though. Have some questions.
    Enhanced PIDs capability would be added plus, but I am not keeping my hopes high for that.

    Alternatively I could just get the software for now - again either Digimoto or PCMSCAN, and hope for OBDPro to come out with a faster hardware down the line(soon!).

    Your thoughts and suggestions are welcome.

  2. #2
    VENDOR - OBDPros
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    359
    If you get any other hardware/software combo I would be very curious to see what sort of refresh timings you get on your vehicle, I would be very surprised if any of the low cost interfaces are able to do a lot better....

    Thanks
    Paul
    www.obdpros.com

  3. #3
    Low Bitrate
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    65
    I have yet to find a clear definite answer about what speed to expect from the myobdic hardware (digimoto) but I believe it would be faster than obdpro ?
    Ofcourse it costs more but I am willing to spend a little more (<$200) if there is a noticeable improvement in performance.

  4. #4
    VENDOR - OBDPros
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    359
    The refresh rate is a metric that no one can really publish since it varies based by vehicle etc, that is why I was very curious to see what you can uncover since we can use your platform as a baseline reference and you would be a neutral 3rd party doing the test (sort of like the UL for OBD interfaces )

    Paul
    www.obdpros.com

  5. #5
    Low Bitrate
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    65
    I wouldn't mind doing comparison or testing for any obd tool manufacturer on my ISO cars, if they let me borrow the tool for a few days.

    I realize there is no set specification for refresh rate for obd tools and although refresh rate varies by vehicle/protocol also, an obd tool manufacturer could list a 'best case but still realistic' figure for just one or two common protocols and that could atleast give a relative idea of what to expect.

Similar Threads

  1. Need FME to U.FL pigtail
    By Autonator in forum Wireless Communications
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 06-01-2011, 02:27 AM
  2. USB GPS to FME and OS X compatible?
    By lorenwade in forum GPS
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-18-2006, 04:15 PM
  3. Antenna
    By Mik in forum Wireless Communications
    Replies: 108
    Last Post: 06-17-2006, 07:19 PM
  4. FME to U.FL Pigtail/connector
    By Caelric in forum Wireless Communications
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-22-2005, 02:41 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •