Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Tablet Sound Quality - Headphone Jack or Bluetooth A2DP

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Tablet Sound Quality - Headphone Jack or Bluetooth A2DP

    Which is better for Sound Quality, Headphone Jack or Bluetooth Adapter?

    Also how much of a SQ loss is there using a tablet instead of headunit? I've looked around but I can't really find any numbers on this.

    I also have the Clarion 1/2 DIN Eq everyone loves to use in these setups.

    thanks for any info

  • #2
    I feel that I can't give you any numbers unless it was really looked into, only generalizations.

    Any headphone output of a tablet or bluetooth module or any other device solely depends on the DAC (digital to analog converter) used in the project in regards to sound quality. however Bluetooth is going to have a harder time due to Bluetooth data throughput limitations. Bluetooth 2.0/2.1 has a thoughput of like 2mbps, which is cutting is cutting it close. I may be wrong here, but if you have a compressed mp3 at 320kbps , the computer then uncompresses it, into like raw bitrate similar to a .wav file, (this is where it would be streamed over bluetooth) where it is then put into the DAC which makes it into the analog voltages you can hear. WAV is typically like 1411kbps, which is really close to that 2000kbps bluetooth ceiling. All of a sudden you have a little interference limiting data throughput and you have a dip/obvious errors in SQ.

    You're at the mercy of the DAC in either situation. It tends to be a you-get-what-you-pay-for. But beware of audiophile-fluff. Any cheap tablet or Bluetooth module is going to have a cheap DAC to keep costs low. I would assume more media-centric tablets (like what the Archos was) would have a higher end DAC in it. Some tablets with their USB hosts can support an external DAC, but last I've heard android OS has issues assigning it properly. I have seen HDMI outputs be utilized for audio output, as HDMI carries the uncompressed digital signal which is fed into the receiving end's DAC. But anything with an HDMI tag is generally expensive due to licensing, but is probably your best option if you strive for the good stuff.

    If you have the chance you should use something similar to an orchestral track, or something with complex mids and highs. Listen for differences between a phone and maybe a computer with a sound card. Heck if a DAC is garbage you'll hear it in the bass too.

    An EQ will not make up for sound quality that would be lost in a poor DAC. EQs are more for flattening response. Equalizing/normalizing speaker/environmental peaks etc.


    ... to answer your original question, I'd stick with the headphone jack of the tablet.

    I could be , but I think I'm correct in my statements.

    Comment


    • #3
      i have an auris bt.... receiver that i use for streaming mp3's to my home stereo... i have to admit. i'm VERY impressed with it. it has far outshined any other bt receiver i've heard/used. I'd say it's on par with the headphone jack.


      http://theauris.com/
      New System in progress:
      M10k
      Phaze TD1500 ~> Dynaudio MD130
      Phaze TD1500 ~> Seas g18rnx/p
      Zapco Ref 500.1 ~ 12" tc-9
      Behringer DCX2496 ~ Envision Electronics psu
      Transflective Xenarc

      My Car Pc Install
      My Boat Pc worklog

      Comment


      • #4
        Bluetooth doesn't transfer RAW Wave/PCM data, it uses SBC, MP3 or AAC Codec to encode the Audiodata.

        MP3/AAC are not supported on many Devices, cause the manufactor have to pay for licenses. So they only support SBC, which hasn't as good SQ as mp3/aac.

        Another option for wireless transfer would be Airplay, which afaik uses the AAC Codec. (There are Apps on google play to add Airplay support to Android Tablets)
        Last edited by BennY-; 09-16-2013, 08:34 AM.

        Comment

        Working...
        X