Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

USB 1.0 vs USB 2.0? Worth upgrading in my case?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • USB 1.0 vs USB 2.0? Worth upgrading in my case?

    I've got a Dell GX240 SFF that I'm converting into a carputer, and I'm not completely clear on what type of devices the USB 1.0 can't handle. I've got a PCI card in the mail to give me a couple 2.0 ports, along with a 2.0 hub for more ports. I plan on running a GPS mouse, a gyration Ultra GT keyboard/mouse combo, and occassionally an external HDD with its own power source for importing movies.

    Normally this would be a no brainer, just stick the USB 2.0 card in there and be done with it, right? Well, I've only got one expansion slot in this thing from what I gather.
    http://support.dell.com/support/edoc...rd.htm#1099156
    What I think I would rather do, is leave the USB card out, and go with an upgraded video card, as I understand the on board video pretty much sucks.

    So with all that being said, what all would I be giving up by sticking with the 1.0 ports vs the 2.0?
    In the works...
    Dell GX240 SFF
    P4 1.8GHz, 256 RAM, 160GB HDD
    8" Lilliput (fab work completed - F-150)

    My worklog
    Misc crap FS - OLD laptop (w/ adapters) | Sony memory | USB key | Printer Dock, etc

  • #2
    Originally posted by SMOKINV8
    I've got a Dell GX240 SFF that I'm converting into a carputer, and I'm not completely clear on what type of devices the USB 1.0 can't handle. I've got a PCI card in the mail to give me a couple 2.0 ports, along with a 2.0 hub for more ports. I plan on running a GPS mouse, a gyration Ultra GT keyboard/mouse combo, and occassionally an external HDD with its own power source for importing movies.

    Normally this would be a no brainer, just stick the USB 2.0 card in there and be done with it, right? Well, I've only got one expansion slot in this thing from what I gather.
    http://support.dell.com/support/edoc...rd.htm#1099156
    What I think I would rather do, is leave the USB card out, and go with an upgraded video card, as I understand the on board video pretty much sucks.

    So with all that being said, what all would I be giving up by sticking with the 1.0 ports vs the 2.0?

    1.0 is 200kb/sec

    that's 12MB a minute

    that's a long tiem to transfer any amount of info

    CD/DVD burners are impossible, external HDs super slow

    Comment


    • #3
      1.0 is 1.5 Mbit/s (thats 200 Kbyte/s)
      1.1 is 12 Mbit/s (that's 1.5 Mbyte/s)
      2.0 is 480 Mbit/s (that's 60 Mbyte/s)

      And these are theorical speeds (read "never reachable" in real life)

      1.1 is OK for mouse, kbd, tsk, gps, TSK, even a zip USB250 will work fine.

      BUT if you want a DVD or a hdd or a webcam in 640*480 @ 30 fps, you'll definetaly need a USB-HighSpeed ( real official name for USB2.0) capable card.
      Now Galileo is real. Muhahahahaha :p

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by DeltaFX
        BUT if you want a DVD or a hdd or a webcam in 640*480 @ 30 fps, you'll definetaly need a USB-HighSpeed ( real official name for USB2.0) capable card.
        That pretty much settles it then, thanks for the help guys.
        In the works...
        Dell GX240 SFF
        P4 1.8GHz, 256 RAM, 160GB HDD
        8" Lilliput (fab work completed - F-150)

        My worklog
        Misc crap FS - OLD laptop (w/ adapters) | Sony memory | USB key | Printer Dock, etc

        Comment

        Working...
        X