Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Multiple hard drives

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Multiple hard drives

    Hello, my system i decided to go with a 300gig 3.5" 7500rpm hd. I want to put a hell of a lot of media in there. one of my friends told me that i was going to be using one hard drive, that there might be a slowing of response. since its trying to access all the media and me running the frontend and so on, he recommended me running 2 HDs, 1 for the software and one for the media. Is this correct? does anybody have any insight on this. I have an old 40gig 2.5 laptop hard drive. i was planning on using the 40 gig for the OS and daisy chain it to the 300 gig. I was going to be using

    Click image for larger version

Name:	12-104-121-03.jpeg
Views:	1
Size:	15.5 KB
ID:	2296896

    and i want to use this



    How can i use this adapter with this ide cable with they are both females. Is there any ide flat cable gender changer? thanks

  • #2
    you could just partition the 300gig in to one little partition(10 or 20gig) for OS/software and whatever is left into a big media partition
    My install... check it out!

    www.mp3car.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=56599

    Comment


    • #3
      you could just partition the 300gig in to one little partition

      I have taken it a step further and partitioned my media drive into about 18 seperate logical drives. With somewhere near 40k mp3s it was taking forever for indexing to complete and my libraries to load. Having all the media organized on seperate logical partitions has helped tremedssly.

      Comment


      • #4
        Hmm, interesting, I never really thought about that. So i could partition it like, lets say, 20 gigs for software, 100 gig for mp3, and i guess the rest video. So this might work huh? so hooking up my 40 gig 2.5" hd isnt necessary

        Comment


        • #5
          Keep in mind that for indexing & stuff that'll help. For physically accessing the data, partitioning won't be enough. No matter how many partitions you have on the drive, it still only has one read/write head.

          Comment


          • #6
            I think the best way to go is a 20-40 gb for your OS, and applications, and then a removable HD for Media, which you can easily take into the house.

            That being said, I have a 120gig drive with 20g for apps and OS and 100 gig for media, and no complaints.
            Is this where the witty comment goes?
            97 Black pearl Mazda Miata MX-5 Carpc V2? maybee..

            Comment


            • #7
              Thank you for ur replies. I think im just going to keep it the way i originally thought of then. with the 40 gig 2.5" for OS and appz and the 300 3.5" with multiple partitions for media. Maybe ill partition it like 3 or 4 times for music, videos, pics and whatever else. thanks

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by GreenBeast
                you could just partition the 300gig in to one little partition(10 or 20gig) for OS/software and whatever is left into a big media partition

                That won't do it.

                When it comes to hard drives it helps to think about how they work. The platters inside are spinning and the head has to move in towards the center of the platter, and back out, in order to locate the head over the data (cylinder) that it needs to read.

                The speed increase from having multiple drives is because you have multiple heads seeking data and simultaneous data transfer occuring between the two drives. This eliminates some contention and thrashing.
                8" Lilli TS
                MB896F Mini-ITX MB
                2GHZ Dothan 533MHz FSB CPU
                1GB SDRAM DDR2 533
                Seagate 300GB SATA150 HD
                ENGENIUS WiFi MINI-PCI CARD 802.11A B 400MW OUT
                Pioneer Slot Load SLIM DVDRW
                Bluetooth V2 USB 2 Dongle
                3COM BKP Cam

                Comment


                • #9
                  The best way to speed up a set of two hard drives is to use a Raid0 array. This is striping. For this to work you would need to identical hard drives size wise. What happens is data is split between each drive like stripes on a shirt, equally divided, one here one there.

                  Raid0 allows for faster file access because two drives are pulling the data. The down side? In a two drive system if either of these drives becomes corrupt you whole install is wasted.

                  In Raid0 you can add as many hard drives as your board can support. If you use three or more drives you can rebuild a lost/damaged drive off parity (spelling?).

                  3 x 80GB hard drives is 240GB of storage. 3x 40gb is 120GB.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    And for the cable you're asking about, that is a IDE to laptop hard drive, if you use 3.5" hard drives you dont need it.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Stealth97
                      I think the best way to go is a 20-40 gb for your OS, and applications, and then a removable HD for Media, which you can easily take into the house.

                      That being said, I have a 120gig drive with 20g for apps and OS and 100 gig for media, and no complaints.
                      I agree, almost all of my PC's I build have a decent size HD for the OS and apps, then a seperate HD for media. I prefer the removable so I can do that data transfer in the house instead over wireless. I bought 2 - 2.5 HD enclosures powered by USB and I have music on one and videos on the other. This way I can take them into work and use them too.
                      2003 Durango Install
                      2003 Matrix Install
                      2004 Escalade Install

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X