Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: Frodoplayer standalone projekt?

  1. #11
    Maximum Bitrate grepzen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    VaBch VA
    Posts
    575
    MADD props to Fodo and his player.. but it is not the 'raison d'ętre'. My car pc will be required to run other applications. Applications that will require today's technology in the form of hardware and Operating System.
    •Micke

  2. #12
    I'm sorry, and you are....? frodobaggins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Ruston, LA
    Posts
    8,846
    Quote Originally Posted by gospeed.racer
    How compatible is Frodoplayer with 98? I thought I remembered some issues? Maybe I am thinking of one of the other Front Ends?
    I don't honestly know.
    [H]4 Life
    My next generation Front End is right on schedule.
    It will be done sometime in the next generation.
    I'm a lesbian too.
    I am for hire!

  3. #13
    Maximum Bitrate GruvThang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Northern Virginia, USA
    Posts
    683
    I think the main requirement would be Windows Media Player 9.
    [COLOR=Navy][SIZE=1][FONT=Comic Sans MS]Tektility

  4. #14
    Nic
    Nic is offline
    FLAC Nic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    1,047
    plus the .net framework, and there are pleanty of other dependancies
    Signature: [==||========] 20% complete

  5. #15
    Maximum Bitrate
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    637
    I think the start point should be win2k for further improvements of frodoplayer in the further

    the mini pwin98 (chinese version) is about 11M in size now BUT it do NOT have IE and internet surport included!

  6. #16
    SWC
    SWC is offline
    Constant Bitrate
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    165
    Quote Originally Posted by Deepgear
    OKOK,

    before talking on like "ohoh, xp would be so wonderfull......"

    When we reduce Xp to a filesize of 100m(the smallest we can get) all the funktions you expected of XP are LOST. No usb Hdd support, no themes, no tools.
    The only differences between a 10mb 98 and a 100mb XP are:
    -the SIZE (NO 32mb Card support)
    - XP is kernel based, so there is a smaller possibillity of a bluescreen, but a nano98 dont answer a bad question with a bluescreen, i tried. Its very stable

    So please please, only say something abot Xp, when you really used a small version of it. I DID !!
    even at 300 mb who cares? you can buy a 512 mb card for under $65 shipped
    I have seen people on this board get XP down to 400MB-450MB EASILY and still meet all of their needs. For the cost and the fact that 98 is outdated I honestly dont think that just because its 10MB its a viable solution when the higher capacity cards aren't cost prohibitive.

  7. #17
    FLAC strohj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Pearland
    Posts
    1,345
    The only advantage i see so far is significantly reduced boot times... but the problem is.. most of use our car pc's for more than just frodoplayer...

    I use it for email and internet as well... and I definitely need some XP functionality.. not to mention the stability vs Windows (reboot) 98 (times)

    besides a lot of us use bluetooth and phonecontrol too
    Pentium 4m 1.5GHz|MB896|Roadie Extreme|XM-Direct|Rikaline 6010|T-View 7"|Streetdeck|160gb Western Digital|1Gb DDR2-533 Ram

  8. #18
    VENDOR - SpatialMinds millec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Mt. Vernon, WA
    Posts
    204
    Quote Originally Posted by frodobaggins
    I don't honestly know.
    I just got it running last night after a few hours of work. I installed gdi+, wmp 7.1, and the distributable version of directx 9.0 on top of 98lite "chubby". I believe I could have gotten away with less than that, but it started out as an attempt to get MediaEngine working and morphed to FrodoPlayer after I got frustrated with getting Media Engine to work.

    The point is that it is possible to get FrodoPlayer to work on a stripped down version of windows 98. I don't know how stable it is yet, but usually less OS bloat makes a more stable platform.

    --Craig

  9. #19
    Maximum Bitrate Marsupial's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    763
    my worries wouldn't be with Win98 VS frodoplayer compatibility, but for Win98 VS driver and new hardware compatibility...
    -Mars

  10. #20
    Low Bitrate
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    88
    Sry, but I think the Idea to get a support in this Forum was not right.
    On myselfe I have no way to do all the work, creating an CarpcOs Frodobased, so there is more or less no sense on this Thread.

    To get an ending:
    My thought was, to create a CarPc os, Small, simple and stable.

    Why?? -Because so many people are asking for a linux carpc solution, but they want to use window applications like frodo or destinator.
    They also have driverproblems with linux.
    So I liked to give everybody, I mean everybody a chance to configure a carpc without difficult OS and driver installation, linux-like.

    At this point I give it up, sry, especially for the people, searching for a one-klick-solution/linux-solution


    Deep




    ----Frodo, please closethis thread, thx-----

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. cant change skins???
    By Hell-Stopper in forum FrodoPlayer
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 11-05-2004, 11:10 PM
  2. Bug Reports 1.09
    By frodobaggins in forum FrodoPlayer
    Replies: 279
    Last Post: 10-22-2004, 11:24 PM
  3. Bug Reports
    By frodobaggins in forum FrodoPlayer
    Replies: 168
    Last Post: 10-16-2004, 01:25 AM
  4. Frodoplayer - Audiobooks & OBD-2?
    By fbruno in forum FrodoPlayer
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-04-2004, 09:51 PM
  5. Frodoplayer and Girder
    By leenas in forum FrodoPlayer
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 05-01-2004, 12:42 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •