Originally Posted by
TahoeTim
Yep, I have an open post in another thread that is unanswered.
I was hoping for more than "sorry you don't like it, not much I can do about that".
How about:
"I'll send you three more voltage dividers so you don't have to go through the return process" (which is broken in the store BTW).
Instead of touting your expensive equipment, why not start believing what me and others are saying? we aren't attaching these to power supplies and $10,000 scopes. These are installed in cars with battery power and lots of ignition noise, etc.
If v4 boards are so good why are you changing the voltage regulator in v6? Sounds like v4 was flawed as far as analog inputs go - why not a recall?
You advertised .0049v accuracy on v4 so I bought them. Now you state temp and load dependencies. This is not funny to me. I am using the board to measure lithium batteries to two digits in an electric car. I can't afford to fry a VERY expensive battery pack. V6 sounds like what I need. But can I return the v4 stuff and get a refund? After all, it doesn't work as advertised unless it is in a temp controlled lab environment. BTW - I am using Centrafuse plugins to control the board.
92% efficient Switched Mode Power Supply Design, < 1% accuracy: The current Fusion Brain, all Fusion Brain's before it, and all competitors use a linear regulator for power. It is cheap and easy, but the output varies with temperature and load, and will skew sensor readings depending on just how hot or how much stuff you have being powered. Not to mention that they are about 11% efficient on a good day, and get really hot. The new FBv6 uses a SMPS where the output will stay constant and accurate to less than 1% of nominal no matter the temperature or load. This will make all sensor readings more accurate, draw less power from the system, and it wont get nearly as hot.
15 Analogue Inputs: Each input is now a 3.3v 10bit sensor port. Giving accuracy of 0.0032v accuracy versus the current 0.0049v accuracy.