Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: Cheap and VERSATILE the motherboard..but is it good ??

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Vantaa, - ,Finland
    Posts
    20

    Question Cheap and VERSATILE the motherboard..but is it good ??

    Have know somebody, is this the motherboard..............

    Manufactory by pcchips. http://www.pcchips.com
    technical data: M587 lmr
    AT- ATX powerstyle
    Ali Aladdin socket 7
    Motherboard include eg. 3d AGP 32mb, 10/100Mbps LAN, 3d pci sound pro, 4 channel speaker out,
    56K Fax/modem ,DMA 66 ,Hardware monitor, USB.... http://203.161.230.38/m587lmr.html

    So.....is it good ?

  2. #2
    FLAC
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Here, There, Everywhere
    Posts
    1,436

    Post

    I wouldnt buy it on the simple fact that the web site puts this crappy "PC Chips" java scrolly thing next to your mouse pointer. Whats the deal with that?!
    Project - GAME OVER :(

  3. #3
    Maximum Bitrate
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Adelaide, SA, Australia
    Posts
    456

    Post

    I was going to use that exact same board. Seems good, has everything for a nice compact install. I now accquired a box, so i dont need it, but i cant see it being bad, maybe the on-board sound could be ordinary. Any one used this board?
    http://www.mp3vl.tk Plans and progress on my install - (Updated 28 June 02)
    Australian mp3car Portal
    mp3car related links Check them out / Add some
    mp3car FAQ - RTFF

    [########==]80% Assembling
    -=Current Progress: Working Sproggy supply, building box.=-

  4. #4
    FLAC
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Portland OR
    Posts
    1,244

    Post

    Originally posted by hornet:
    <STRONG>Any one used this board?</STRONG>
    I Used one a lot like it. Check it out, www.skylab.org/~chugga/mpegbox/
    MPEGBOX - Plexiglass Computer
    www.mpegbox.com

  5. #5
    Variable Bitrate
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    louisville,ky,usa
    Posts
    259

    Post

    In general, I have found that PCCHIPS boards have their place. Typicially in office machines, maybe school library's, etc.

    I have now had two PCCHIPS's boards in the car, the first one I physically broke (doh!) and the sencond (BookPC) was sold as it got flakey.. The problem with it was.. No slots to replace stuff. This has slots, and it's cheap.. Why not. I dunno how it would do for playing DVD, but nothing a DVD decoder card couldn't fix.

    One thing to note, with any board that uses shared memory for Video, you are going to see a decrease in system performance. Usually in all the area's people like us care about.. Video. Slower processors with a nice video card will play things like ASF and DiVX (which require gobs of CPU time to decode) than machines with Faster procs and intergrated video.. One note on that statement, if you're throwing a 700 mhz cpu at the problem, it's probably not going to be a big deal.
    I cheat, I own an empeg.
    Meskimen's Law: There's never time to do it right, but there's always time to do it over.
    http://civic.mp3car.com

  6. #6
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Minneapolis,MN
    Posts
    48

    Post

    As far as I know, Ali Aladdin chipset is full of bugs. They did 5 revisions on it with no success. They lack performance across the board and some of them refuse to work with AGP video cards.
    Via Pro chipsets are much better alternative in terms of performance and compatibility. Of cause, they are not perfect too. I would stay away from Ali Aladdinóitís pure garbage. Thatís why K7 never attained the same performance as Celeron processor from Intel.
    Maestro MP3 player: MIS K7T Pro-2A, AMD 1.2GHz, RAM 640MB, 80G HD; Screen: Datalux 10.4 VGA; Head Unit: Kenwood Z727; RF control ON/OFF/RESET

  7. #7
    Maximum Bitrate Meatballman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    Hartsville, SC
    Posts
    747

    Post

    Originally posted by Magnum:
    <STRONG>Thatís why K7 never attained the same performance as Celeron processor from Intel.</STRONG>
    Am I the only one that finds this funny?

  8. #8
    Live and Kickin'
    Arby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    1,377

    Post

    No

    K7 = athlon. Athlon's kick celery *** in every way they can be compared (except for maybe price)

  9. #9
    Low Bitrate
    Join Date
    Oct 1999
    Location
    Oakville, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    74

    Post

    Originally posted by Redeyed:
    <STRONG>Have know somebody, is this the motherboard..............

    Manufactory by pcchips. http://www.pcchips.com
    technical data: M587 lmr
    AT- ATX powerstyle
    Ali Aladdin socket 7
    Motherboard include eg. 3d AGP 32mb, 10/100Mbps LAN, 3d pci sound pro, 4 channel speaker out,
    56K Fax/modem ,DMA 66 ,Hardware monitor, USB.... http://203.161.230.38/m587lmr.html

    So.....is it good ?
    </STRONG>
    I bought this board.
    The video performance is evil.
    If you are planning on doing anything video related like DIVX I would say forget about it.
    There are other boards with integrated video that perform a lot better.
    I use a gigabyte one now with integrated trident blade 3d.. its still shared video memory but the divx playback performance is way way better.

  10. #10
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    Minneapolis,MN
    Posts
    48

    Post

    I apologize for my mistake. I did not pay attention when I typed this nonsense. Sorry!
    It should be other way around: Thatís why K6-2/k6-3 (NOT K7) never attained the same performance as Celeron processor from Intel.. You got me, Meatballman!
    Maestro MP3 player: MIS K7T Pro-2A, AMD 1.2GHz, RAM 640MB, 80G HD; Screen: Datalux 10.4 VGA; Head Unit: Kenwood Z727; RF control ON/OFF/RESET

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •