Yes that's the whole point...
Your choice, but theres no reason you can't. Although I myself am thinking of giving you bad rep just because of the insanity of your "argument".
Last time I checked, there was no HU natzi. It has always been up to the user whether or not to do something.
I am completely confused by this... A CarPC DOES do infinitely more things than a HU and always will. That's because it is like those overlapping circle charts. All HUs are CarPCs but not all CarPCs are HUs.
What is a HU? A computer that runs an OS and some frontend software usually on an ARM processor. What is a general CarPC around here? Well we have the majority with x86 compatible processors, some that have IBM PPC processors like on the old macs, and some using ARM processors like on that wall plug. Now there are far more (openly available) programs for x86 than for ARM or PPC really. So by choosing an x86 platform for your system base, you have way more than 700 extra things it can do over the ARM.
All stability really is, is a smart choice of hardware and software that play nicely together. If you do it like a cheap bastard and use an old HD, and a P4 northwood powered off of an inverter, yeah you are going to have problems. The HD will probably die, the processor probably overheat, and the inverter cause noise, fire, or destroy components with its crappy sine wave.
As for sotware, any OS works. I'm sure kev will rave about linux here somewhere () but really if you know what you are doing or know how to ask people that know what they are doing, you can lock down any OS to be stable. Blue screen free since mid 2006 for me, with an unoptimized, unlocked, XP install. Not too difficult.
You are either really naive, or really stupid. Only person I know who spent that much is hijack, and he has a bagillion screens and is open about how wasteful he was and how he didnt research things and bought twice (or more). Many setups range in the $500 to $1000 range total and can be put together in a weekend. Mold in the screen and running wires takes the longest. Building the PC is childs play and can be done during a single episode of spongebob... if you watched the show and only worked during the commercials even. Software takes some time to install, but no effort. You put in the disk, enter your config options, click go and wait an hour or two. When you come back the sweet sweet smell of a fresh OS install will greet you.
Anyone that takes 2yrs obviously doesnt have a clue what they are doing, are doing something much more than simple HU functionality, having budget issues, or the project is on the backburner...
It would be interesting but it would be a horrible business model. They will obviously use Linux because of licensing and extreme kernel modification.
The good companies already do. For instance the navigation systems on Lexus (well all toyotas actually) is a small modified linux distribution. You can burn a DVD with a special coding in the first few packets, and it will start the system up in a bootloader mode where you can download the data to the HD. It can be run in a VM on a regular x86 machine as well. It is already here, and is transparent. A CarPC can be just as transparent as long as a dolt is the one installing it.
Yup. It is. And you lose.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



) but really if you know what you are doing or know how to ask people that know what they are doing, you can lock down any OS to be stable. Blue screen free since mid 2006 for me, with an unoptimized, unlocked, XP install. Not too difficult.





Bookmarks