Page 1 of 6 123456 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 58

Thread: Does using pc's in your vehicle cause increased fuel use?

  1. #1
    Low Bitrate
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Saskatchewan
    Posts
    68

    Does using pc's in your vehicle cause increased fuel use?

    Just wondering?

    TiTUS

  2. #2
    Maximum Bitrate osirisdon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    686
    no

  3. #3
    Low Bitrate
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Saskatchewan
    Posts
    68
    That must be my shortest question ever.. and that is the shortest answer I've ever seen!

    I just figured it might increase fuel usage, with the extra load on the engine and alternator...

    TiTUS

  4. #4
    Maximum Bitrate osirisdon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    686
    nope

  5. #5
    Variable Bitrate
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    hoppers crossing, victoria, australia
    Posts
    282
    it would slightly

    extra weight
    extra load on alternator

    miniscule difference tho i dont think anyone would notice it you would prolly get worse fuel econemy driving around with the windows open creating drag lol

    cheers
    pcman
    donate to my team in the ****box rally all proceeds go to the cancer council http://www.everydayhero.com.au/dodgy_mechanics

  6. #6
    Maximum Bitrate Seraph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Elmhurst, Illinois
    Posts
    672
    It should not but I am going to have my alternator rebuilt so that I get more amp. Just in case.
    - Lwin M. Maung
    If it's stuck, force it. If it breaks it needed replacing anyway

  7. #7
    FLAC
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Posts
    1,612
    you lose about 1mpg per every 200 pounds of weight

  8. #8
    Maximum Bitrate fluffy2097's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Fremont, CA
    Posts
    594
    Quote Originally Posted by bgoodman
    you lose about 1mpg per every 200 pounds of weight
    So I shouldn't try and put an ENIAC in my car?
    A digital mind lost in an analog world.

    Learn to ask smart questions!
    http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

    My car PC: The Lost Cause!

  9. #9
    I'm sorry, and you are....? frodobaggins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Ruston, LA
    Posts
    8,846
    Quote Originally Posted by fluffy2097
    So I shouldn't try and put an ENIAC in my car?

    you might could get PART of it in this..

    [H]4 Life
    My next generation Front End is right on schedule.
    It will be done sometime in the next generation.
    I'm a lesbian too.
    I am for hire!

  10. #10
    FLAC cproaudio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    so cal 2 hours from everywhere
    Posts
    1,120
    This type of question is almost the same as "will remote start worsen your gas mileage?" Yes it does but not because of weight or extra load on the alternator. The time you spent setting up your PC for the trip that you're about to take while the engine is still running. That's what increases fuel use when you're running your PC.
    For example, during remote start for engine warm up, the engine usually takes about 3-4 minutes to warm up to a driveable status. Remote start usually runs the engine for about 15 minutes before shuts off. People who use remote start often leave their car running while doing quick stops at AM/PM and also quick bathroom breaks. I notice when I use my remote start to do all the above, I got 14-15mpg. I would always have to refuel my little 13 gallon tank after 185 miles of driving. I noticed the same thing when I'm using my PC. I would park and let my engine run with AC on while I setup songs, copilot, read some emails, and before I know it, I spent 30 minutes with the engine running and got 14 miles to a gallon. What I do now is I set everything up and running before I start my truck. Now I get about 18 mpg. My carpc, stereo and tonneau cover weighs about 400lbs. EPA rated my truck at 17 city and 21 hiway. I'm getting 18 city and 25 highway, 29 if I drive at 65 with AC on. For some reason my truck's gets better gas mileage with the AC on even though the windows are rolled up. I dont think the 200lb/1mpg is not very accurate. My parents sienna with 7 passangers and luggage adds about 1000lbs and it only loss about 2 mpg compared to the empty load.
    NEW complete and updated My project with 100+ pics on 7-4-03
    If you have a Shuttle FV24 motherboard in perfect working condition for sale, please PM me.

Page 1 of 6 123456 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •