Well, at least thats wht I've been led to believe. To figure lat. and lon. you need at bare minimum 2 satellites to lock. This would give you a possible location of 4 different places in space. A reasonable guess could be made and put you on 2 different places on the globe. With a 3rd satellite you could accurately get location, but not altitude. We all know this.
What I'm thinking, using the same theory that I've been given, I would think that with 3 satellites telling you that: "you may be here, but we're not going to be as accurate as you would like" the accuracy would be so-so. But when you start to rely on 4 different satellites all telling you the same thing, but not with any real accuracy, I would think that altitude (the only real reason you need 4) may be the one to suffer. The others may say that you are driving off the road, but when you think of 4 spheres moving around (to simulate inaccuracy) altitude data may move significantly.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

Reply With Quote
Actually, civilian GPS receivers are required to stop tracking if they detect some particular set of speed and altitude conditions.
we could get that accuracy too without much hassle, but civvies are not allowed

Bookmarks