Iguidance Differences?

**Cheekz185** · 10-28-2005, 12:35 PM

What is the difference between ig 2.1NA and 2.1.1? What are the additions?

**justintime** · 10-28-2005, 01:14 PM

Why don't you email iNav and ask them?

**Marvin Hlavac** · 10-29-2005, 08:41 PM

If I recall correctly there were some bug fixes. One bug fix in map loader (issue with El Paso, Texas), and something else, I don't remember. I think 2.1.1 introduced F-key as a shortcut for full screen mode, and also recalc registry tweak became possible.

**mccdeuce** · 11-01-2005, 07:29 PM

if your question really is "is it worht it?" I still use version 2.0 and have no problems. It runs great, and perfect and its cheaper on your pocket.

**Cheekz185** · 11-01-2005, 07:57 PM

Originally Posted by Marvin Hlavac

If I recall correctly there were some bug fixes. One bug fix in map loader (issue with El Paso, Texas), and something else, I don't remember. I think 2.1.1 introduced F-key as a shortcut for full screen mode, and also recalc registry tweak became possible.

MARVIN and word on whats going on with ig v3

**Marvin Hlavac** · 11-02-2005, 06:45 AM

No, no rumours, no nothing ;-)

**Aksor** · 11-04-2005, 02:01 PM

I noticed a big difference in rural map coverage between 2.0 and 2.1 expecially in Canada

Laz

**Sonicxtacy02** · 11-04-2005, 02:07 PM

yes 2.0 and 2.1 had different map coverage i dunno about anythign after that.

**Marvin Hlavac** · 11-04-2005, 04:39 PM

Yes, 2.1 was the very first version that included FULL coverage of Canada. The previous versions only included a handful of the largest cities. But that's past now