I think it's a good idea, but surprised if there isn't already one out there. Problem is that people see the $$$ and start charging for it. The main problem I see, as you've suggested is moderation and the maintenance of current data. I've no doubt people will contribute data, but whether old data will be maintained well I'm not sure. As soon as the amount of garbage data increases, the less likely people are to use it.
I suppose as well as having "trusted" contributors, you also have some form of ranking on a camera. e.g. if more than one person has identified a camera at a particular location, then it is a more reliable item of data. You'd need some form of fuzzy location logic in there because locations will never be identical, but if they're within say a couple hunder metres then regard them as the same camera, perhaps. Reliability could also be based on some form of "last spotted" date. i.e. the last date data for a camera was submitted.
In terms of presenting the data, I'd probably offer it in XML format. Maybe provide it via a web service.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks