Nick
'99 Ford Escort ZX2 CarPC <-- RIP Feb '07
2006 Chevy Equinox LS (Current Project)
**VIA EPIA PD 1ghz Mobo, OPUS 150, 7" LinITX LCD touchscreen, 512 Ram, 60Gig HD, DLink Bluetooth, Belkin 802.11g wireless,
...I love the French language...especially to curse with...Nom de Dieu de putain de bordel de merde de saloperies de connards d'enculés de ta mère. You see, it's like wiping your *** with silk, I love it.
...I love the French language...especially to curse with...Nom de Dieu de putain de bordel de merde de saloperies de connards d'enculés de ta mère. You see, it's like wiping your *** with silk, I love it.
Michael - I've been trying to find that information since I decided to challenge. It's a pretty guarded secret (from google, at least).
Tuning forks only work with radio waves (doppler effect). Since laser is comparing one reflected distance to another, this doesn't work. All the 'ticket defense' articles I've read say that the gun must be checked against a calibrated moving target (i.e. another police cruiser). I'm sure they must have some other optical tool they use to verify proper alignment, though. Just wish a helpful laser-experienced cop would chime in here...
You bring up a good point - not just from an insurance standpoint, but from a consumer perspective as well. Maybe it's just me, but I think if every car manufacturer offered a video DVR as an option - much in the way they now offer XM or Sirius, I think it would be a huge hit. Think of the consequences of knowing that every altercation between one moterist and another is recorded. Better yet, if an officer knew that there's a good chance his next stop will record the events (and speed) as it REALLY was, I think you'd find more LEO's doing checks and double-checks on their equipment. Suddenly their word in court wouldnt' be the only evidence presented.
Don't know if the officers were trustworthy, but they both commented that the County's cars did not have any video recording equipment. Could have been a bluff though. Good point.
I'll have to get a list together when I get back in town. For now, it's basically five main components - camera ($60), portable DVR ($200), video-overlay box ($120), hand-held GPS receiver ($60),and a 7" LCD monitor ($60).
The DVR is mounted in my sunglass holder, the camera is on the back of my rear-view mirror, the overlay box is under my back seat, and the gps receiver is on teh back dash. It's all hidden. The only thing that you might see (if you know it's there) is the postage stamp-sized camera. The monitor is a real low-profile (1/4" thick) version that clips on to my sunvisor.
The day that insurance companies put cameras/dvr in my car, is the day I no longer drive. The notion is ridiculous (to me). Anyways, cops already have dash cams, so do many commercial vehicles. There is no need for big brother to start putting cameras in your car. You do realize, you will be getting speeding tickets in the mail, 'cause that new so called "camera" will also have capabilities you didn't sign up for. Are people really so eager to give up rights, can you really trust big brother to only take an inch. I have a nasty feeling they will come back for a mile.
I can't speak for anyone else, but the 'option' to have a dash cam would be for the owner's benefit. Any recordings would be put to flash card (mine is SD) and removable. Having it somehow communicate, or relay the information to anyone other than the owner isn't part of my vision. I figure it this way; If the video is to my benefit, I use it. If not, no one needs to know I have it.
I work for an aerospace company and we produce Digital Video Recorders (TransVu) for public transportation (Air/Sea/Land). They work great as security systems because if someone opens your door and you have access to the internet, you can have pictures emailed to your phone and at the same time you could type up www.mycarblahblah.com and see where your car is and such.. pretty wild... anyway, DVR's wont be standard for a few years because most of the stuff available to the public is crap and breaks easy and the good stuff is really expensivethere are also insurance liabilities with having devices like that distracting the driver.
"You can not sedate all the things you hate"
~Marilyn Manson
My 2001 Jeep Wrangler http://www.cardomain.com/ride/661695
Just this evening on ABC Evening News they had a story on Drivecam cameras that will be offered for free to parents who insure teenage drivers. This is exactly what I was after with my camera - an extra witness for when something goes wrong.
BTW, take a look at the attached image. This is a screen grab from me driving past a portable radar-based speed sign. Notice how my GPS imprint and the display are DEAD-ON? You'd think my GPS would be 4MPH slower. Hmpf...
Court date was yesterday. Judge reduced citation from 72 to 68 based on the video evidence. Also withheld points. Probably the fairest of outcomes. In the end, my speed infraction went from 17 over to 13 over, and my insurance company won't know.
On the down side, less than 24 hours after my court date, my wife was pulled over - doing 18 over. No dash-cam or GPS. It won't be here until next week![]()
Good work on this. It's inspired me to try and put this kind of setup into my car.
Bookmarks