Page 14 of 46 FirstFirst ... 456789101112131415161718192021222324 ... LastLast
Results 131 to 140 of 458

Thread: Software options for Tuning

  1. #131
    Low Bitrate BenOBS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    QC/CA
    Posts
    94
    Quote Originally Posted by durwood View Post
    BTW-I think I am going to attempt to "fix" the small delay plugin for car use in the near future. I will post it if I have sucess. See this thread:

    http://www.driverheaven.net/showthre...=thesmalldelay
    This is the best way to have delay and save dsp ressources but it has a fixed value. Anyway, once you got the right delay, your dont need to change it.


    About the "touchsreen friendly"... Personnally i think i will get a mini-keyboard and use arrows to changes values. A single click on the setting will be enought...

  2. #132
    Car Audio Moderator durwood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Chicagoland (St. Charles,IL)
    Posts
    2,028
    Hmmm...I am going to take a look at that ozone as it has some intersting different features that might be good for some, but I am not seeing crossovers, and time delay. If it alters the sound too much, you start to fade from the original sound it was recorded in...which is bad for reproducing the origianl recording feel. The room simulator is something new, but it might alter the sound too much. I'll take a look and see what I find. I love playing with new things

    Added:

    This is the best way to have delay and save dsp ressources but it has a fixed value. Anyway, once you got the right delay, your dont need to change it.


    About the "touchsreen friendly"... Personnally i think i will get a mini-keyboard and use arrows to changes values. A single click on the setting will be enought...
    Hi BENOBS and welcome to our forums. I saw your post in driver heaven. I was thinking we could change the maximum change from 2400 samples to something smaller like 600 samples. Then we could easily have 6-8 channels of individual delay. THere must be a better way though then making it a fixed delay. I haven't had time to look at it but will inthe next few days. Stick around...unless you try it yourself.

  3. #133
    Newbie IceFyre's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by durwood View Post
    Hmmm...I am going to take a look at that ozone as it has some intersting different features that might be good for some, but I am not seeing crossovers, and time delay. If it alters the sound too much, you start to fade from the original sound it was recorded in...which is bad for reproducing the origianl recording feel. The room simulator is something new, but it might alter the sound too much. I'll take a look and see what I find. I love playing with new things

    No it doesn't have all the features we are looking for. For those I will use the DSP on the Audigy and the kx drivers.

  4. #134
    Newbie
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    19
    Will a soundblaster x-fi work with the kx app? I looked at there site it is not listed but not sure if its just assumed it will or wont?

  5. #135
    Maximum Bitrate Dragonknell911's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    521
    REBUILDING!!

  6. #136
    Car Audio Moderator durwood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Chicagoland (St. Charles,IL)
    Posts
    2,028
    THE XFI is using a whole new dsp chip.

  7. #137
    Newbie
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    19
    That sucks

  8. #138
    Maximum Bitrate Dragonknell911's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    521
    Yeah, but it's a good reason to stick with the audgiys if your going cl anyways

    like this one
    REBUILDING!!

  9. #139
    Car Audio Moderator durwood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Chicagoland (St. Charles,IL)
    Posts
    2,028
    That sucks
    Agreed. The XFI is using a much better chip with more resources available. The 10k1 and 10k2 chips used in the live,original audigy and audigy 2 have been around for so long. One can only hope the Kx project is expanded.

  10. #140
    Car Audio Moderator durwood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Chicagoland (St. Charles,IL)
    Posts
    2,028
    Quote Originally Posted by Dragonknell911 View Post
    Yeah, but it's a good reason to stick with the audgiys if your going cl anyways

    like this one
    I don't think the audigy 4 is supported either. Nothing later than 2. Even the newer audigy se and value are not supported.

    Correction: Audigy 4 is partially supported.

    http://kb.kxproject.lugosoft.com/list.html

Similar Threads

  1. AutoTap used to develop custom software!
    By Dodger1417 in forum Engine Management, OBD-II, Engine Diagnostics, etc.
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-25-2006, 11:51 AM
  2. comparison of GPS Software
    By gunsandrosses in forum Newbie
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-28-2006, 10:56 PM
  3. CarPal Bluetooth Module & Digimoto Software....A Very Good Combo..
    By jmciver in forum Engine Management, OBD-II, Engine Diagnostics, etc.
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06-16-2006, 05:08 PM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-15-2005, 02:38 PM
  5. CoPilot Software or USB GPS Receiver package
    By Zip-Lock in forum Classified Archive
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-13-2004, 08:30 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •