let's put it this way. if you get a VGA screen, it will be readable. if you get an RCA screen, it won't. Everything is much fuzzier, and text is not readable unless it's very large (at 800x600 in windows, I can BARELY read song titles in winamp)
if you plan on using an RCA screen and don't have a separate screen, or laptop or something, to access your computer, you will have to use a magnifier program if you want to be able to see well enough to do anything.
This picture is a little too low-res to really show it... but this is the RCA screen I have.
and believe me, it's not MUCH more readable in person than it is in that picture.
it's not too bad if you use VNC on a laptop to access the mp3 box if you need to actually do anything (install programs, change things, whatever) because you don't need an extremely crisp display for things like winamp.
I now use the a desktop magnifier program, that shows a magnified view of the area around the mouse cursor in the lower corner of the screen. this makes it possible to see menu items and such, so i am not completely crippled.
However, if you don't think you can deal with these handicaps, then don't get a non-VGA monitor. I would be using a VGA now, but I needed a screen in mid-winter during my "broke college student" months... now that summer is approaching and the "rolling in dough" months are returning, it's very likely that i'll buy a touchscreen VGA, and take the RCA screen and stick it in the back seat for watching movies or something.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote




Bookmarks