Whats the brightness? (in cd/m2)
i ran by the dynamix utlrabright touchscreen, and it said it had a 400:1 contrast ratio, and if i'm not mistaken, thats brighter than both the xenarc and lilliput, and a lot of people are talking about how their screens aren't bright enough, so i was wondering if anyones every actually used this monitor and what they think of it
One thing that may be relevant, some manufacturers publish the brightness of the LCD itself, and may fail to realize the dampening effect that most touchscreens have on the final output.
Kinda like saying that your car is a 120hp car, even though less then 100hp get to the tire because of the transmission.
or like the Mid engined RWD Clio 3 litre V6 with 240bhp compared to the traditional FWD 172 (or now 182) which was a hell of a lot lighter and this much faster through the twisties.
Originally Posted by senseless228
what a sensless waste of time this thread is!!! (pun intended)
that is essentially like the original linITX/MM400... etc screen with 400cd/m2 brightness before TS so about 280-300cd/m2 after and a lot more fuzzyness and glare from the TS to boot
The contrast ratio (or 'Contrast Radio' as thay put it ) is 150:1 which is normal for these screens.
Right, or the Orko GJK 2 Furlong B5 with the 193KW compared to the traditional WJK 91 which had twice the hopscotch because the Eldinger conversion was .7% above the GJK's orthotricyclen.Originally Posted by Scouse Monkey
bah, my bad guys, haha, so basically this monitor is average?