No way there's 85 to 90% loss. Here's why:
A typical screen consumes about 10 watts (or 1amp at 12volts)...that's to run the electronics and the backlight. If you take the electronics out of the equation AND assume that the backlight is 100% efficient, then there can only be 10 watts of illumination produced by the backlight. Period, 'cause Energy in = energy out - conversion to some other form.
If the touchscreen blocked 90-95% of that light, then you would be left with a measly 1 watt or so of illumination, which would be dim even in a dark room. So, the touchsceen simply cannot block that much light.
Maybe those figures are a bit more fuzzy then you think ;-)
Of course, the upside of the above is that since <10 watts of illumination provides ALMOST enought brightness, then a relatively modest 50 watts at the light source should be VERY bright indeed.
Another point to consider is that one either needs an EXTREMELY BRIGHT (your emphasis) point light source that is well diffused, or a somewhat less than extremely bright light source that is more evenly diffused from the beginning...like compact flourescent bulbs.
Finally, the heat produced by the assembly will be function of two things:
1) The efficiency of the light source
2) The light absorbance of the screen...the more light the screen blocks, the more energy it will absorb (in both the visible and non-visible spectrums), and the hotter it will get.
I think issue #2 is the most concerning, as it has the most potential to damage the LCD in the sort of setup I envision, with significant space between the light source and the LCD. In your setup, the LEDs
sound like they touch (or almost touch) the screen, necessitating that the entire assembly be cooled. I don't have to care if my light source gets hot as long as it doesn't cause the light source itself to fail.
Finally, I found this thread:
Backlight using compact fluros and a ligtbox?
Bookmarks