Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: What is the best 8" LCD touchscreen for viewing text @ 800x600?

  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    5

    Question What is the best 8" LCD touchscreen for viewing text @ 800x600?

    I have searched many forums, but I have yet to find a review that addresses my particular concern. Here is the problem:

    The largest LCD I can fit in my car is an 8". The one I have now (an Innovatek TM-868) has issues displaying text. At 800x600, entire rows and/or columns of pixels simply do not show up. For example, a row of pixels might be missing along the top of a row of text, and any capital T's in that row will look like lower case L's. It is not that I am getting rows of dead/black pixels, it just seems that the screen is not mapping the output of the graphics card correctly on the screen--skipping rows of pixels. Imagine cutting out a row of pixels on your screen, and then sliding the two halves of the screen together. The resulting image is what I see.

    Also, if I use a higher resolution, everything looks weird. If I use a lower resolution I can not see the entire window of my applications--which sucks for GPS software.

    If anyone is using an 8" LCD touchscreen and can view text perfect at 800x600 or higher resolution, please let me know what make and model you are using!!!

    Thanks,
    Anthony

  2. #2
    Fusion Brain Creator 2k1Toaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Colorado, but Canadian!
    Posts
    9,851
    Have you tried setting your resolution to 800x480?

    Some of those monitors have "squishing" effects because they are widescreen and the resolution is not a 4:3 standard such as 640x480, 800x600, 1024x768, but rather 16:9. Might as well try that before buying a new screen.
    Fusion Brain Version 6 Released!
    1.9in x 2.9in -- 47mm x 73mm
    30 Digital Outputs -- Directly drive a relay
    15 Analogue Inputs -- Read sensors like temperature, light, distance, acceleration, and more
    Buy now in the MP3Car.com Store

  3. #3
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    5
    Only the standard 4:3 ratio resolutions are available. Also, my screen is now cracked, that is why I am taking the opportunity to buy a better one. It still works as display, but touch screen function gone.

    I have seen that many people use the Lilliput 8" screen. If I do not get much feed back here to the contrary, I am going to get one of those.

  4. #4
    Raw Wave shotgunefx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    1,800
    Quote Originally Posted by ahildoer View Post
    Only the standard 4:3 ratio resolutions are available. Also, my screen is now cracked, that is why I am taking the opportunity to buy a better one. It still works as display, but touch screen function gone.

    I have seen that many people use the Lilliput 8" screen. If I do not get much feed back here to the contrary, I am going to get one of those.
    I've got an 8" lilliput. It's not bad at 800x600, but honestly, I expected a sharper picture, 1024x768 the text is fuzzy, but having nothing to compare it to but larger monitors, I don't know if it's a fair complaint. Of course the TS itself probably doesn't help.

  5. #5
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by shotgunefx View Post
    I've got an 8" lilliput. It's not bad at 800x600, but honestly, I expected a sharper picture, 1024x768 the text is fuzzy, but having nothing to compare it to but larger monitors, I don't know if it's a fair complaint. Of course the TS itself probably doesn't help.
    Is the text legible at 800x600, or are rows of pixels not rendering?

  6. #6
    Raw Wave shotgunefx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    1,800
    Quote Originally Posted by ahildoer View Post
    Is the text legible at 800x600, or are rows of pixels not rendering?
    It's legible, obviously easier to see larger text than smaller though.

    I did have a bit of trouble (I'm using Linux/X.org) at first, it would get the scanning rates wrong and the screen would get goofy, (parts shifted off, or the screen would go nuts until I powered cycled), but tweaking the sync rates fixed it.

    Maybe why you are having your current problem?

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 04-13-2007, 02:23 PM
  2. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 09-16-2006, 06:52 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-27-2005, 05:46 PM
  4. FS: 15inch LCD and touchscreen
    By CURTISBEEF in forum Classified Archive
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 09-25-2004, 01:46 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •