well it will be. Xenarc is 15:9 (800x480 native)
Apparently it looks better then 848x480 though as this squashes it the wrong way or summit.
I have it set to 800x600 on the Mac mini and the image is stretched a bit on my Xenarc 700TSV.
well it will be. Xenarc is 15:9 (800x480 native)
Apparently it looks better then 848x480 though as this squashes it the wrong way or summit.
Says here on the box it is 16:9 ratio.Originally Posted by Scouse Monkey
I am having issues with CoPilot running @ 800 x480. What would be the next step up, so to keep the aspect?
It lies.Originally Posted by ipodlounger
[H]4 Life
My next generation Front End is right on schedule.
It will be done sometime in the next generation.
I'm a lesbian too.
I am for hire!
848x480 looked great on my Lilliput, but looks like **** on my Xenarc. I got a better screen and a worse resolution... ironic.
Is this a mac specific problem? or universal Apple/PC related problem?
"If it works this good why F with it?" -KMFDM "Intro"
Strive for ethical wardriving: http://faq.wardrive.net/
My CarCPUs: v1 - 2000 | v2 - 2004
Mp3Car Meets: http://detrimental.org/eyecandy/MP3CarMeets
when an aspect ratio is quoted it is supposed to be for the actual display area not the pixels themselves. If you took a 16:9 display area and populated it with slightly rectangular pixels you could get something like this. I haven't measured my Xenarc so I can't tell you is this is the case or the box does indeed lie...
Seriously sucks... so I have to live with a slightly stretched image?... lame...
Xenarc tech support said most PCs with ATI Radeon display fine.
Bookmarks