Windows Media Player 9 or 10?

**AllShowNoGo** · 12-24-2006, 06:06 PM

Which uses less system resources? Which one runs smoother with MI? Thanks!

**reddeath30** · 12-25-2006, 07:08 PM

Originally Posted by AllShowNoGo

Which uses less system resources? Which one runs smoother with MI? Thanks!

Theyre both pretty much the same, but I have seen smoother performance in 3rd party visualizations in version 10

**2k1Toaster** · 12-25-2006, 07:11 PM

9 an 10 are equal. 11 is bloated but much nicer looking. Classic of course is the best performance wise.

**AllShowNoGo** · 12-26-2006, 02:27 AM

I'm running a 933mhz p3 with a basic no frills on board graphics card and will be upgrading to 256 or 512mb of ram. I disabled full screen mode and it runs pretty smoothly now. I've just gotten bored with the visuals and I highly doubt my carputer will be able to run g-force (third party plugin).

**reddeath30** · 12-26-2006, 12:43 PM

Originally Posted by AllShowNoGo

I'm running a 933mhz p3 with a basic no frills on board graphics card and will be upgrading to 256 or 512mb of ram. I disabled full screen mode and it runs pretty smoothly now. I've just gotten bored with the visuals and I highly doubt my carputer will be able to run g-force (third party plugin).

I would definitely recommend going to at least 256mb ram. The next release of Mobile Impact will also need a somewhat decent graphics card. One that has at least 32Mb ram on it.