Picture as signature

[vull]

this should be available!

[Bugbyte]

Spams the forums, slows down load times.

[TruckinMP3]

spams the forums, slows down load times.

+1

[vull]

like loads of text in signature is any better as a spam?
if reasonable size is set then the load time won't be visible + has anyone heard of caching?

[h3rk]

Ive been to some forums where picture sigs are the norm. I think its annoying, personally. When I want to see someones project or ride, Ill go look for it.

[Bugbyte]

You're not allowed "loads of text". There's a limit.

Of course, I'm not the final authority here. It's not my forum. But I think no picture sigs reduces the clutter and is visually distracting. You do get to pick your avatar, after all.

[Heather]

Good suggestion that we will consider over the next few months. But at the moment it will not be offered.

[kibble]

Ive been to some forums where picture sigs are the norm. I think its annoying, personally. When I want to see someones project or ride, Ill go look for it.

I agree, it gets VERY annoying when you have to scroll down (or up) and see the same image (especially when they're huge) multiple times because it's someone's sig.

But I think no picture sigs reduces the clutter and is visually distracting. You do get to pick your avatar, after all.

I agree with this too. Wait, I think you mean that HAVING pic sigs are visually distracting, not the lack of.

[Bugbyte]

[meddler]

I am dead against it. If slow the forums down and tbh it is just annoying.