anyone know about supplemental hydrogen?

**Chairboy** · 07-19-2008, 01:45 PM

Tesla's work was based on energy transmission, not creation. The power still has to come from somewhere.

**david69leonard** · 07-19-2008, 02:03 PM

actually both, he did invent the AC motor and a bunch of other cool shizza, but one of his main studies was wireless transmition of electricity and as legend tells, he figured out a way to tap into the harmonics of the earth creating energy

**Tidder** · 07-19-2008, 02:08 PM

Here's what I don't understand. Why is supplemental hydrogen so hard for all you to grasp, yet forced induction isn't? Same basic principal, using some of the cars power to help create more power (spin the turbine, or crank a pulley) to suck in more air to make the engine more efficient. It's supplemental too.

I used WD-40 to supplement my engine. Each cylinder has it's own pfitzer valve to inject it. I get about 152mpg out of my chevy escort with a 350.

And as far as Tesla's source of power, Chuck Norris would rub 2 sheep together and create electricity.

**Chairboy** · 07-19-2008, 02:24 PM

Tidder's got it right. Get some 3-in-1 oil and some gauze pads. And you're gonna need 'bout ten quarts of anti-freeze, preferably Prestone. No, no make that Quaker State.

**JS8531** · 07-19-2008, 03:32 PM

Some of the poster here are fairly dense and cant seems to understand that hydrogen injection does work, you know who you are.

1) Using electrolysis is not an efficient method. Stop going around in a circle saying you cannot get out more than you put in because everyone already knows that. Its just old news. Eficiency is the key to a succesful hydrogen suplementation.

2) Injecting hydrogen into the engine to get better mileage is good enough for hobbyist. In this thread no one is claiming to be inventing a water powered car in their back garage.

3) Like a said, pretty much every thread in this forum spiral down the drain. There is nothing useful in this thread to help the original poster apart from the links I have provided.

4) If someone want to play with the experiment, let them be. No one stopping you putting a PC in your car. Making a water cell is merely a hobby to most people, if it work for them good, if it doesnt, whats the big deal? why are you guys getting all stressed out about it? Last time I checked no one give a toss how ****ty your car PC install is.

...

**JS8531** · 07-19-2008, 03:45 PM

Originally Posted by lbridges

I, for one, would never dream of standing in the way of someone making an advance for humanity and the planet. However,

A productive discussion would seem to require an exchange of opinion and/or fact presented in a common language using a logical set of premises for whatever culture is hosting the discussion.

You have advocated for a process that seems to violate several generally accepted laws of physics, i.e., Conservation of Energy, and Thermodynamics. Logic would dictate that the onus of proof is therefore on you. Else I could freely assert a flying purple dragon is in my backyard, and if you did not believe me, then I would be justified in a veiled insult through claiming you refused to have a productive discussion.

I think you are guilty of the logical fallacy of a non sequitur, i.e., If A is true, then B is true. B is stated to be true. Therefore, A must be true.

Dont mix wild claims like flying purple dragon in your backyard againts hydrogen generation. They are 2 separate things. Last time I checked, Im not here to impress you or making you agree.

What is your opinion on hydrogen injection? Lets see if you have something useful to contribute in this thread that may help the OP out.

Have you actually tried the experiment yourself or are you just going by what you read on an old text book?