Actually, it is both. Next time check before you make an ID10T out of yourself with two exclamation points.Originally Posted by Spaghetti
http://www.answers.com/spell&r=67
Michael
Hey! Seth's Greek man - he doens't even write in Latin scriptOriginally Posted by Wiredwrx
And it's spelt "SPELT"!!
Actually, it is both. Next time check before you make an ID10T out of yourself with two exclamation points.Originally Posted by Spaghetti
http://www.answers.com/spell&r=67
Michael
...I love the French language...especially to curse with...Nom de Dieu de putain de bordel de merde de saloperies de connards d'enculés de ta mère. You see, it's like wiping your *** with silk, I love it.
Well that's actually the American spelling and my use of two exclamation points was to imply that I was making statement in jest and to bring down the tension in an otherwise heated debate. Whereas with you, it seems a Greek person spelling 'Guandanamo' is reason to **** him on from a great height.Originally Posted by Wiredwrx
I'm sorry you have to resort to name-calling - the fact that you had to resort to picking out spelling errors in the first place during a discussion shows how small-minded you are. I actually thought you were genuine in your arguments, but you really can go take your flag-waving patriotic bull**** rhetoric and stick it up your ***.
Idiot.
Actually, if you intended jest, then you should have used a smiley or something to that effect. I apologize for taking the statement seriously if in fact you didn't mean it as a personal attack. Here in the States an excalmation point is an emphasis, not a sign of joking.Originally Posted by Spaghetti
I am genuine in my arguments. Perhaps I should not have questioned his spelling. That was a statement that was made out of anger and frustration from the obvious Personal attacks from Seth, while up until then all of my statements were "neutral".
I also did no such thing as **** on him. While I admit that I probably should not have questioned his spelling, other then that statement, I did not "personally attack, berate, denegrate" or in any form "**** on him", from low or high. I did not attack him personally, or result to name calling.
I provided my source, answered some questions/statements he made and made some additional points.
I will apologize for taking your statements in a manner that it was not intended by you, and apologize for my statments as they were uncalled for, expecially in light of the fact that your statement was not meant as a personal attack.
As for my patriotism. Well, for that I do not believe I will, or should apologize.
Differences, inteligent conversation, and discourse is part of a free society. I respectfully differ in many ways with your "beliefs", but you are entitled to them.
Michael
...I love the French language...especially to curse with...Nom de Dieu de putain de bordel de merde de saloperies de connards d'enculés de ta mère. You see, it's like wiping your *** with silk, I love it.
Ok, I apologise too (and for calling you an idiot)Originally Posted by Wiredwrx
As for being patriotic, well yes you should be. I think you both have valid points - people will always be proud of where they're from. Although I do ask that you respect my dislike for your gun laws - gun crime in places like London and Manchester are spiralling out of control
I'll just leave it to you and Seth now then....![]()
yes, i'm pretty if you are an american student studying abroad you may not drink till 21, even though legal drinking age here is 18Originally Posted by Scouse Monkey
Signature: [==||========] 20% complete
I'm 28.Originally Posted by Wiredwrx
Do you feel you were personally attacked? Hmmm...it just looks like your ideal UScentric world was just hurt and you're firing at any direction.
Nobody attacked you but if you really REALLY think that something I said was more insulting, arrogant and selfish than your statements then I trully apologise.
Allright now what you're reading was the constitution from 1975. That's the first one after the 1967-1974 dictatorship. Let's see what the current constitution says (taken from the official link I gave you above from the Greek parliament):Originally Posted by Wiredwrx
Article 7
1. There shall be no crime, nor shall punishment
be inflicted unless specified by law in
force prior to the perpetration of the act, defining
the constitutive elements of the act. In no
case shall punishment more severe than that
specified at the time of the perpetration of the
act be inflicted.
2. Torture, any bodily maltreatment, impairment
of health or the use of psychological violence,
as well as any other offence against human
dignity are prohibited and punished as provided
by law.
** 3. The general confiscation of property is
prohibited. The death penalty shall not be
imposed, except in the cases provided by law
for felonies perpetrated in time of war and
related thereto.
4. The conditions under which the State, following
a judicial decision, shall indemnify persons
unjustly or illegally convicted, detained
pending trial, or otherwise deprived of their
personal liberty shall be provided by law.
As I told you before the only mention was for criminals of war.
The constitution is revised every 4 years to stay current.
Now my dear friend when you decide to enter a debate you are OBLIGED to do your reasearch, read, compare and do everything else neccessary to express valid opinions. I don't care if that will take you a lot of you bedtime with "freedom" but it must be done or else you're posting crap and litter the forum with junk.
I expect an apology.
Ok now let's see...Originally Posted by Wiredwrx
I assume you're aware that the constitution (at least here) is a set of foundamental principles that govern the Nations political/social life.
Of cource there are seperate laws which take care individual problems with more precision.
Tell me really can a Nation's laws extend to only 154 pages?
So yes there are laws that prohibit search on the streets and other stuff like that.
Again peacefully I ask you to read articles 5 and 6.
When you're done come again to play![]()
Hehe...well yes I can't spell correctly. I apologise.Originally Posted by Wiredwrx
Try to write a sentence in Greek and let's see how many errors you'll make![]()
Oh oh isn't that a personal attack now?.....Nahhhh.....only Seth makes such remarks.
Regarding Guantanimo or Guandanamo or whetever it is called you're right it's a topic of an entirelly different conversation. Regardless let's pretend it does not affect you in any way. Does Echelon or Carnivore affect your precious "freedoms"?
More arms to battle arms....I prefer to build theaters and watch ancient drama instead. Thank you.Originally Posted by Wiredwrx
![]()
Yes I said more or less because you wrote half of the truth:Originally Posted by Wiredwrx
** Interpretative clause:
The provision of paragraph 6 does not preclude
that the law provides for the mandatory
performance of other services, within or outside
the armed forces (alternative service), by those
having a substantiated conscientious objection to
performing armed service or, generally, military
duties.
You see you can avoid serving in the military if you like.
Again research more mate....
I fail to see why you keep repeating that the constitution has changed many times. Yes it did because of political circumstances and to stay current. So what? What is your point exactly?Originally Posted by Wiredwrx
I see you'd REALLY like me to stfu (wonder why?)...ok I'll do it.![]()
Originally Posted by Wiredwrx
So you're telling me this was a "neutral" statement and/or not provoking?Originally Posted by Wiredwrx
Anyway mate it is always a pleasure to meet new people. It is also a pleasure to listen to ideas and opinions and evaluate them. I suggest the same to you.
Cheers and good luck paying up your loans to buy more "freedom"...
![]()
lol @ america being the most free country in the world
this sums up my feelings towards america:
http://www.vanwensveen.nl/index.html
*note: no offence to the americans because individually i have nothing against you, in fact there are a lot of americans i like, its just i dislike the society as a whole*
Signature: [==||========] 20% complete
and that's the end of this chapter
CarPC status: iPod, 3,456,217 songs so **** you
Is America free-er than anywhere else?
Personal freedom is what you make of it. *****ing back and forth about constitutions that are merely just pieces of paper, doesnt make what is written on them any more real than what you buy when you purchase "insurance".
What I mean is that the Constitution of a country isnt the final word on law or rights or freedoms. Its the people in the country who make that. Blacks were "free" for a century but werent "free" like white people until the 1960s...
Roe v Wade makes abortion legal in the country, but abortion isnt in the Constitution, just a simple foundation for the future people of the country to base their own laws and freedoms on.
You can live in the richest most prosperous country in the world, and it could still be populated by bigot racists. There goes your freedom, if your not white.
"You gotta look at me and you gotta say, hey buddy, why are you so mad and I'll tell ya, cuz for all the following that went over to the English bands from the SLC. Those ****in English chaps can only say **** about us Americans, all we were to them was a bunch of hicks. Well you know what, I'm not a ****in' hick. I don't wear cowboy boots, I hate the ****in rodeo, horses smell like **** to me, and I never **** anyone in my own bloodline. By definition I am not a redneck and goddammit I ain't no ****in' hick.
(0.0%-) starting over
iPad 3G 64GB, RF 600.5 amp, JL10W0V2, 8 Infinity Components
Bookmarks