Originally Posted by rustyboxx
So let me get this right. Scouse deleted his post that he allegedly posted at around 8.35pm, long before you posted your reply. Then you resurrect his deleted post for all to see at 10.20pm and promptly ban him for a month. For what it is worth I didn't see his post on here at 9.07pm.
So, we can conclude that his post didn't stick around very long. Yet for some strange reason you decide to enlighten everyone despite Scouse deleting the post.
Is it just me or am I right in thinking something strange is going on here? Why did you decide to resurrect his post? Are you trying to set an example of Scouse or just settle some old score that you might have with him? And as for Scouse not being able to substantiate his accusation, did you or didn't you alter the post count?
I don't know what you have to do to become a mod on this forum but I would have thought you would be subject to some accountability for your actions. I'm sure quite a few people would like to know your reason for sharing Scouse's deleted post with the forum long after it was deleted and more importantly why you now see fit to ban him for something that you brought to light.
And a month's ban, pretty harsh for something that was absent in this thread don't you think?
you don't liek the way it's run, start your own forum.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

Reply With Quote


)

Bookmarks