Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: 20% decrease in boot time with Diskeeper... ?

  1. #1
    Maximum Bitrate Crinos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Kristiansand, Norway
    Posts
    489

    20% decrease in boot time with Diskeeper... ?

    I just read an article on a Norwegian site, about this new and "awesome" product called Diskeeper. (http://www.diskeeper.com/).
    In short, it's a real time defragmenter, keeping search times to its minimum...

    I realy can't see the big use of this, unless one have everything on one drive... Personally I have allways one system drive, and atleast another drive for everything else than system. (And we're talking pysical here, I allways have two pysical drives).

    And with SSDs.. don't even know if it's possible to defragment them?
    Well.. It's probably possible, but don't think it really matters any..

  2. #2
    FLAC WuNgUn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,351
    How old was this article??
    Diskeeper has been around for ages.
    Search for Disktrix, and see why they claim it's better.

    Personally, I have my doubts about the 'physical' placement of data. My desktop PC uses 2 drive RAID stripe, yet Disktrix apparently assigns my 'performance' data to the outer, faster spinning sectors of the 'disk'??

    I imagine it does the same 'illusion' with a partitioned drive?

  3. #3
    FLAC
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta
    Posts
    1,237
    Blog Entries
    1
    Anyone have good hard evidence, like maybe time your boot/hibernation times before and after defrag?

    Ive used UltimateDefrag by Distrix multiple times with different settings and I have yet to notice any noticeable difference. I dont even bother defragging my carpc anymore because system performance feels the same, regardless of defrag.

  4. #4
    Neither darque nor pervert DarquePervert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Elsewhere
    Posts
    13,949
    Diskeeper has been around since the NT4.0 days, and possibly before that.
    Microsoft licensed their basic defrag engine and incorporated into every OS since Win2000.

    You should never defrag an SSD, period.
    SSDs have a limited number of write cycles. IT has to do with the physical properties of the flash memory. Defragging involves lots of disk writes, so if you defrag your SSD, you are shortening the lifespan of your pricey SSD.

    In fact, it is recommended that you turn off the automatic defrag that is done my newer versions of Windows (Vista and Win7... Not sure about XP) if you intend to use a SSD for this very reason.
    Have you looked in the FAQ yet?
    How about the Wiki?



    Under normal circumstances, a signature would go here.

  5. #5
    Low Bitrate Salmizar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    81
    If boot data is placed on the outer edge of the platter, then it should load faster. More data can be read at a given speed the farther out you go.

    Having never used diskeeper, I can't speak for their claims. But if they did this, and I suspect they do. You would see an increase in boot times. But only on conventional drives. SSD's don't have this problem.

Similar Threads

  1. Media Player Error
    By Autockr989 in forum StreetDeck
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 02-25-2008, 10:14 AM
  2. Oh where have all the Shutdown Controllers gone (and boot time)?
    By SuperAJ in forum General Hardware Discussion
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 05-21-2005, 09:57 PM
  3. Using DOS and 98 at once, can I toggle at boot time with a keypress?
    By bombboyer in forum Software & Software Development
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-07-2003, 11:13 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •