I also wanted to know this. I want to add to the question (if you don't mind):
Is it worth it to have hibernation with a CF (size VS speed) or the speed won't differ much??
Whats the resume time like using a CF card as the boot device?
Im looking for the fastest resume time possible
Also, I know the Opus has a slight power on delay time. What DC-DC PSUs dont have this delay?
I also wanted to know this. I want to add to the question (if you don't mind):
Is it worth it to have hibernation with a CF (size VS speed) or the speed won't differ much??
I was thinking the same before i bought my stuff..
I googled and searched on this forum and come up with this:
I have a Serial ATA 5400 RPM 80 gig and its very fast and stabile it does its job very well in the car.
I live in Sweden and have about -15Cº in the winter as normaly temp and it works good.
The Only interrest in a CF is that its not that Temperature sensitive.
Ive heard its "populare" in Canada sence its very very cold there in winter.
The negative is that the CF Dont have 100% Read correction.. it loses some info in every 10 000 reads or something.. and thats not good in Operative system.. It might work anyway in most cases but i prefer an ordernary Harddrive =)
__________________
Ampie Case
M1-ATX 90w
EPIA ITX 1,3Ghz, Firewire
80 GIG SATA
512MB
7 TFT Touch Super
Pioner Slot in DVD-RW writer
108 Mbit Wireless Lan
100 M Bluetooth Range
//Power Nisse
My Betasite -> http://haagen.se
I understand that unless it's a fast CF card, and apparently they vary enormously, the read time is behind a 2.5" HDD @ around 12Gb per sec. The main advantages of CF are size, power consumption and no moving parts. Speed is a negative.
The best way to reduce hibernation time is to use less RAM, 256 instead of 512.
Bookmarks