umm... I've programmed in VB6, Java, C++, and .NET (VB.Net for work and C# for my hobby projects). No one here has seen the CF code (besides the programmer) so we can't really judge how well it's programmed. Not to slam the guy that wrote it, but I'm just saying. You never know. I've never had speed problems with my .NET apps. Like xBrady said already, to say that .NET is slow because CF is slow is a bit of a jump.
BTW, here's Quake II .NET: http://www.vertigosoftware.com/Quake2.htm
and here's Quake II Java: http://www.bytonic.de/html/jake2.html
If they can do that in .NET and Java, I'm sure you can make a very fast front end.
As another example, I'm currently dabbling in Mozilla developement. I've made a front end using an existing skin which loads up instantly and the response is a lot faster than any other front end I've tested so far. it's written entirely in XUL and JavaScript besides a few XPCOM components for XM and interfacing with the OS (hibernate, standby, etc). it runs in FireFox.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

Reply With Quote





Bookmarks