View Single Post
Old 02-03-2007, 07:38 PM   #4
mrbean_phillip
Variable Bitrate
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 414
See attached dyno-sheets. - please note that these graphs represent rear-wheel power figures, not on the flywheel The car-buffs will understand what I mean.

I settled for a conservative 368rwkw, leaving room for a bit more if needed, I have a 2nd tune for around 381rwkw, but, it is not significant more. Will give me time to get to know the UTE a bit better before I go overboard with powerlevels.

Runs a bit better than the stock F6 Grandma Grocery-getter, so I need to be wakeup around the handling side of things now, as, even though you can see very nice linear build of boost, and thus power, the torque is a phenomenal 530FtLb on the wheels - add 22% to that to get the flywheel numbers, and then convert to Nm, quite decent numbers.

To convert 530 FtLb torque to Newton-meter, we must use 1.356x530=718Nm, and this is on the rear wheels. Add 22% to this, and we get 875Nm on the flywheel - which makes for a fun experience.

Same with the horsepower, for 493hp on the wheels, we will have 602hp on the flywheel 368rwkw x 0.7456 = 493hp, + 22% = 602hp (flywheel)

493 odd HP vs torque (FtLb)


RWKW vs Boost Press



and RWKW vs Lambda



Let me know what you think.
mrbean_phillip is offline   Reply With Quote