Quote: Originally Posted by
durwood 
Quote: Originally Posted by linked Wiki article
In real systems, such a device is commonly implemented on a single
integrated circuit that lacks only the clock necessary for sampling, and is generally referred to as an
ADC (Analog-to-Digital converter)
From what I'm gathering PCM is the data its self.
Sitting here talking to Monte the best comparison I can come up with is this:
The clock is what actually makes PCM useful. Much like having lines of code that are uncompiled. Just because the lines of code are uncompiled doesn't mean that they are not lines of code, it just means that they don't have a useful meaning just yet. In other words, PCM data without a clock, is just PCM data...it's data that has not yet been utilized.
If the PCM protocol were to include clocking, then wouldn't it have to specify the clock timing as well? Then wouldn't that narrow down the purpose of PCM and it's protocol and make it entirely too specific for general use? Perhaps I'm getting way too ahead of myself...lol
Another comparison...Cat5 cable is designated Cat5 by a standard (protocol). A piece of Cat5 cable cannot be designated as Cat5 without being able to transfer at least X amount of data a second. So in order to specify clocking in with the PCM protocol, wouldn't you really need to specify the clock speed as well for it to be a legitimate protocol?
Quote: Originally Posted by durwood
I'm reading through these now! Probably going to take me a bit though...hehe
btw - here's the thread I have going on Stereophile:
http://forum.stereophile.com/forum/s...ge=0#Post32327