|
 |
|
11-09-2007, 12:48 AM
|
#151
|
|
Newbie
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7
|
any word on whether the digitalfx skin is supported or not??? someone had mentioned that it was NOT supported earlier...
now, one more question...would it be possible to add a pci video card as the one in the llink below???
im a noob...and am admittedly confused. any help is greatly appreciated...
thanks!!!
http://www.geeks.com/details.asp?invtid=HM300L3-C3H
|
|
|
|
Sponsored links
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
11-09-2007, 01:50 AM
|
#152
|
|
Newbie
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7
|
anyone know if the digitalFX skin will work on this board? earlier in this thread, i believe someone had mentioned that it was NOT supported...but this person was not sure whether it was a mobo related issue, or something to do on the software side (ie. drivers, directX-3d stuff...etc..)
anyone tried this skin out using the d201gly??? any help would be appreciated.
thanks!
|
|
|
11-09-2007, 09:33 AM
|
#153
|
|
Constant Bitrate
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 135
|
I won't have time today, but I can load DFX2 tomorrow and let you know how it works.
I really don't see why it wouldn't work. Its handled everything else I've thrown at it with no problems at all. I'm guessing it probably couldn't do Crysis though...
__________________
Is it that it's fun? Or that it lets you forget yourself?
|
|
|
11-09-2007, 10:33 AM
|
#154
|
|
Maximum Bitrate
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Federal Way, WA
Posts: 691
|
I've been running RR and DFX 2.5 for months with no problems.
I'm courious, how could a skin not run because of the motherboard? Is that even possible?
|
|
|
11-09-2007, 10:56 AM
|
#155
|
|
Constant Bitrate
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 135
|
He was worried about DirectX and/or Flash support. The SiS graphics chipset on this board only supports DirectX 7. And some other people were concerned that the limited graphics capabilities might hinder flash animations etc.
But... just cause the chipset is DX7 doesn't mean it can't run DX9, it just won't support all of the latest versions of the shaders etc. And this board really handles flash without any problems.
So there's your answer Hennessey, it will run DFX just fine.
__________________
Is it that it's fun? Or that it lets you forget yourself?
|
|
|
11-09-2007, 11:22 AM
|
#156
|
|
Variable Bitrate
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
Posts: 235
|
I've been using RR and DigitalFX with this board, with WinAmp Visualizations and Destinator 6. Everything works excellent!
__________________
\/ |_ /\ [)
1995 Civic Sedan EX
CarPC status: [ ||||||||||||] 100% - Phase 1 Complete!
YouTube video - WorkLog
|
|
|
11-09-2007, 12:32 PM
|
#157
|
|
Newbie
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7
|
sweeeeeeet! thanks guys.
|
|
|
11-09-2007, 06:45 PM
|
#158
|
|
Newbie
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7
|
just ordered a d201gly2 earlier this afternoon. they are out there and relatively cheap. i wish they show up on the mp3car store as part of the integrated packages sometime soon...i feel bad broadcasting the name of the place that carries it...but i guess since the store doesn't even have them up yet...PM me, if interested in finding out where they can be found...
|
|
|
|
Sponsored links
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
11-21-2007, 05:46 AM
|
#159
|
|
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 8
|
the INTEL d201gly2 support 800x480/600 resolutin?
|
|
|
11-21-2007, 11:15 AM
|
#160
|
|
FLAC
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ontario/Canada
Posts: 1,141
|
Quote: Originally Posted by Caso85 
the INTEL d201gly2 support 800x480/600 resolutin? 
Yes it does, question is, does your monitor TRUELY support 800x480. I have this board, supports it no problem, my lilliput is supposed to be native 800x480 but the screen is to wide and is a known problem. The SIS utility could be more robust to support H&W adjustment however.
I run at 800x600 just fine.
__________________
Carputer
Installed Since April 2, 2005
Intel D201GLY|Fusion Brain|Audigy2 NX||ODBPros ODBII|Engenius362ext |Motorized lilli|GPS Rikaline 6010|Opus 150|Powermate|Ergonomic Touchpad|
Sound Stage
Eclipse CD8455|MTX TA3404+421D|Infinity Comps|ID 12" Sub
|
|
|
11-21-2007, 12:26 PM
|
#161
|
|
Variable Bitrate
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
Posts: 235
|
The same issue here, Lilliput does not display 800x480 correctly, so I end up using 800x600...
__________________
\/ |_ /\ [)
1995 Civic Sedan EX
CarPC status: [ ||||||||||||] 100% - Phase 1 Complete!
YouTube video - WorkLog
|
|
|
11-22-2007, 11:28 AM
|
#162
|
|
Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 7
|
Question: I have a 2gig stick of PC2 6400 running at 800Mhz (manually set in the bios). It is probably overkill, but all I had in my spare parts box at the time. I assume that in Hibernate, XP writes the memory to the HD and then reloads that image back to the memory when it comes out of hibernation. Do you think I would see a quicker reboot if I used 512mb instead of 2gb? Mine seems slower than some of the times posted here by others. I'm curious if 256mb would run. Just need the minimum for this project. Anyone tried something as low as 256?
Additionally, since the recent conversation regards the resolution, I run a VM70 and mine won't do 800X480 either. I can't expand the phase enough to fill the screen. 800X600 runs fine, but of course, all the vids and pics are elongated.
|
|
|
11-22-2007, 01:28 PM
|
#163
|
|
Constant Bitrate
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 135
|
Yes, less RAM will probably translate into quicker hibernate/resume times. However, with the 2GB stick you have a few options. Check out this article http://support.microsoft.com/kb/108393. You can set the maximum memory that XP can use to 512MB-1GB which will speed up the hibernate cycle. Then you could find a RAMDrive utility to use the remaining 1GB as a RAM based drive. Any files that are copied to the RAMDrive after bootup will take virtually no time to load the next time you access them.
Or... you could just downgrade the physical RAM in your system.
__________________
Is it that it's fun? Or that it lets you forget yourself?
|
|
|
11-22-2007, 01:59 PM
|
#164
|
|
Variable Bitrate
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil
Posts: 235
|
When the machine is waking from hibernation it will read from disk and write back to memory, right? Let's say your PC has 2GB of RAM but is only using 300MB of it.
Will the hibernation file contain 300MB of data or 2000MB?
__________________
\/ |_ /\ [)
1995 Civic Sedan EX
CarPC status: [ ||||||||||||] 100% - Phase 1 Complete!
YouTube video - WorkLog
|
|
|
11-25-2007, 08:57 AM
|
#165
|
|
Constant Bitrate
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 135
|
If you've specified in boot.ini that it is only allowed to use 300MB and that is why that's all it using, then the hibernation file will only be 300MB.
If you haven't specified anything and it is only by chance that its using only 300MB, then the hibernation file will be 2GB. That's why using more ram takes more time. It will take a lot longer to write the 2GB file to disk and read it back.
__________________
Is it that it's fun? Or that it lets you forget yourself?
|
|
|
|
Sponsored links
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:18 AM.
| |