Sponsored links

Go Back   MP3Car.com > Mp3Car Technical > General Hardware Discussion


Reply
 
Share Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-18-2008, 08:26 PM   #76
Variable Bitrate
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 328
BlackStealth is on a distinguished road
I've installed Windows four times, one time with Windows XP Pro SP2, and all other times with TinyXP SP3 trying out different options, audio worked each and every time. I use the supplier driver CD and let it install all drivers for me automatically. I'm a bit surprised to hear some people having issues with audio driver. Perhaps Windows would get less confused if you leave all USB devices unplugged and install them one at a time after Windows + Drivers have first installed successfully.
BlackStealth is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Advertisement
 
Advertisement
Old 08-19-2008, 02:56 PM   #77
Constant Bitrate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 122
ctsoccer13 is an unknown quantity at this point
Interesting...

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...ient,1997.html
ctsoccer13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 10:10 AM   #78
Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12
gorby is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote: Originally Posted by rickd View Post
There is a software application called the Intel Integrator Toolkit, which is the software you vendor used to create that custom boot screen. I don't know what sort of expertise is required to make use of it, but I suspect that anything the vendor did can be inspected, undone, or modified with that software. (Disclaimer: I have not downloaded or used this software--you're on your own with it.)

http://downloadcenter.intel.com/Filt...stems&lang=eng

I note that there is now a new BIOS available from Intel, version 103. Since my machine is stable and so far doing everything I want of it, I'm not tempted to update the BIOS again.

My machine does indeed report 800x480 as a resolution option when I review display configuration in XP.

RickD

Very frustrated! According to the vendor, the only change they did to stock BIOS was put a custom flash screen, that's all. According to them, this should not cause any issues for upgrading. In the mean time, I tried latest BIOS (0103) and previous BIOS (0099) and both give me an error that this update is not intended for my BIOS. Now, I am trying the Windows version of the update that Intel provided. Maybe I should try a boot version to see if I get any further; but I would be surprised. My setup is rock solid but inability to get the native resolution is driving me nuts!

Thanks for all the info though.
gorby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2008, 09:39 AM   #79
Low Bitrate
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Illinoise
Posts: 59
SpecialEd is an unknown quantity at this point
Rick,

Can you give the the driver info for the updated resolutions you are showing available.

This is what I have, and the best I can get is 800 x 600, now that my video card sit the bed on me.

Intel 82954G Express chipset family

date: 2/15/2008

version: 6.14.10.4926
SpecialEd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2008, 09:04 PM   #80
Low Bitrate
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 78
blbrchnk is an unknown quantity at this point
Anyone else having issues using CF-IDE adapters with this board? I have purchased two separate ones and with both they are only transferring in PIO mode at a max of 2.5 MB/s. If I connect the same card via USB and boot to the HDD, it transfers upwards of 25 MB/s. I switched it from master to slave, I switched the IDE cable out, nothing seems to matter. I was just wondering if anybody was successfully using an IDE adapter for a CF card on this mobo.
blbrchnk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2008, 10:58 PM   #81
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 29
rickd is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote: Originally Posted by SpecialEd View Post
Rick,

Can you give the the driver info for the updated resolutions you are showing available.

This is what I have, and the best I can get is 800 x 600, now that my video card sit the bed on me.

Intel 82954G Express chipset family

date: 2/15/2008

version: 6.14.10.4926

I'm using BIOS 099, dated 7/30/08, as I recall. I see that Intel now has a newer one available, but I have not bothered with it.

I'm using Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 14.32.4.4926, dated 4/16/08. That's the latest one shown for XP. There is a later one for Vista.

And I'm using Realtek audio driver version 5672, dated 8/5/08, and Realtek TFL8101 LAN driver version 5.694, dated 6/11/08.

I also installed the Intel Chipset Software Installation Utility, version 9.0.0.1011, dated 7/30/08, but I did that before installing the video and audio drivers listed above.

The Graphics Media Accelerator driver was the last one I installed, and that finally made Control Panel happy and not declare the integrated graphics as an "unknown device" (even though it ran my monitor without error). It was after installing that driver that I confirmed that 800x480 was available on my machine and that it worked on my 800x600 monitor.

All of these are the latest available drivers for XP for their respective devices as listed here:

http://downloadcenter.intel.com/filt...l&submit=Go%21

I dunno why that 800x480 resolution works for me and not others. That was specifically mentioned as a fix for the BIOS version 065, but I think the GMA drivers are also needed to make it available. I didn't really test that feature at intermediate points.

RickD
rickd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2008, 11:03 PM   #82
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 29
rickd is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote: Originally Posted by blbrchnk View Post
Anyone else having issues using CF-IDE adapters with this board? I have purchased two separate ones and with both they are only transferring in PIO mode at a max of 2.5 MB/s. If I connect the same card via USB and boot to the HDD, it transfers upwards of 25 MB/s. I switched it from master to slave, I switched the IDE cable out, nothing seems to matter. I was just wondering if anybody was successfully using an IDE adapter for a CF card on this mobo.

I'm using the Addonics CD-IDE adapter, mounted in the PCI slot bracket (it does not use the PCI bus, of course).

http://www.addonics.com/products/fla...er/adidecf.asp

Make SURE you are using an 80-conductor ribbon cable rated for ATA100 Ultra. If you are using the standard 40-wire cable that a lot of CD drives use, you will not get much speed at all.

I have not measured the transfer rate on mine, but I do have a CF card with Ubuntu Linux on it and it will boot from that faster than from my SATA hard disk, so I don't think I'm experiencing your same issues.

RickD
rickd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2008, 12:02 AM   #83
Low Bitrate
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Illinoise
Posts: 59
SpecialEd is an unknown quantity at this point
Thanks Rick!

Will update accordingly tomorrow and post an update.
SpecialEd is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Advertisement
 
Advertisement
Old 08-28-2008, 07:15 AM   #84
Low Bitrate
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 78
blbrchnk is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote: Originally Posted by rickd View Post
I'm using the Addonics CD-IDE adapter, mounted in the PCI slot bracket (it does not use the PCI bus, of course).

http://www.addonics.com/products/fla...er/adidecf.asp

Make SURE you are using an 80-conductor ribbon cable rated for ATA100 Ultra. If you are using the standard 40-wire cable that a lot of CD drives use, you will not get much speed at all.

I have not measured the transfer rate on mine, but I do have a CF card with Ubuntu Linux on it and it will boot from that faster than from my SATA hard disk, so I don't think I'm experiencing your same issues.

RickD

I used the cable that came with the motherboard at first then tried one that I knew worked and it made no difference. I should know its not the cable though because I can hook up two HDDs to it and they both run perfectly fine. Logic Supply was highly recommended to me by the guy that wrote the ewf cf setup instructions so I decided to give that a try, but it appears that maybe the CF card isn't the problem.

I wonder if it is a windows detection issue then, because the BIOS doesn't ever seem to have any issues with it and when it boots, the progress bar goes really quickly until the end, where it hangs (maybe moving it over to PIO mode).
blbrchnk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2008, 12:27 PM   #85
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 7
scooterbike is an unknown quantity at this point
I can also use the 800 X 480 resolution after upgrading my bios to the latest version. The tricky part i found was, that it could not be found in the list of available resolutions, I had to do some looking around as described in the C/P below:

Quote:
1) Right-click on a vacant area of your desktop (not over an icon or toolbar).
2) Choose Properties from the popup menu.
3) Choose the Settings tab.
4) Click on the Advanced button.
5) Choose the Adapter tab.
6) Click on the "List All Modes" button.

Now a question, has anyone run this board with the M3-ATX, or is it too power hungry for this little PSU
scooterbike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2008, 05:23 PM   #86
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4
brux2dc is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote: Originally Posted by rijk View Post
The pata disk was on the same connector as the ssd when installing ?
Xp wants the os-disk to bee on ide 0

On my board the ide was ide 1 and the sata was ide 0, so xp would only install correctly on the sata port.

The mobi was on the sata and xp installed fine. And even opened windows at the end of the xp install. But after a restart of the system, disk error, and the disk was unreadable with xp running on the other drive. Never figured it out. Hope you get it sorted

I didn't see an answer to this posted, but just an FYI you need to install the SATA chipset drivers when installing XP at the beginning (F6 I think). Without them XP can sometimes be installed to the drive, but when you try to boot it won't work. Especially true the older the XP version!

You likely know this, but just trying to help educate the masses.

brux2dc
brux2dc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2008, 05:27 PM   #87
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4
brux2dc is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote: Originally Posted by gorby View Post
Very frustrated! According to the vendor, the only change they did to stock BIOS was put a custom flash screen, that's all. According to them, this should not cause any issues for upgrading. In the mean time, I tried latest BIOS (0103) and previous BIOS (0099) and both give me an error that this update is not intended for my BIOS. Now, I am trying the Windows version of the update that Intel provided. Maybe I should try a boot version to see if I get any further; but I would be surprised. My setup is rock solid but inability to get the native resolution is driving me nuts!

Thanks for all the info though.

Could you you take the custom firmware and open it in the Intel BIOS customizer; see what is there and compare to stock BIOS?

Maybe take the latest BIOS and mod it like your current customized BIOS?

brux2dc
brux2dc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2008, 08:11 PM   #88
Constant Bitrate
 
RyanB95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Wallkill, NY
Posts: 128
RyanB95 is an unknown quantity at this point
Using this motherboard now with no problems so far. It's very quick thus far, I'm very pleased with it. I really don't think there is a much better choice for the price tag. Unless of course you want to get the Dual core version that is coming out.
__________________
1995 AWD Tsi Talon

Intel D945GCLF
M2-ATX
2GB Corsair
30GB OCZ SSD
BU-353
Lilliput EBY-701
Logitech DiNovo Mini
LSX VOID 3.3
RyanB95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2008, 11:22 PM   #89
Low Bitrate
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Illinoise
Posts: 59
SpecialEd is an unknown quantity at this point
I too am running the little falls set-up with no complaints other than the on-board video is only so-so at handling the skin fade transitions I am using on my front-end. Also, it's a pain to set-up correctly without tech support and/or forums such as these.

It actually does get pretty hot if you don't have adequate ventilation also..... Overall though, pretty sweet little carputer board for under 100.
SpecialEd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2008, 11:29 PM   #90
Maximum Bitrate
 
Woofnstuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Auckland
Posts: 558
Woofnstuff is an unknown quantity at this point
the dual core is out
__________________

Woofnstuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Advertisement
 
Advertisement
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Shuttle sv24 or fv24 michael_16j General Hardware Discussion 6 06-05-2006 03:56 PM
FS: Mobile Intel Pentium 4 Processor - M 2.20Ghz CPU $100 shipped OBO DLe Classified Archive 5 05-11-2006 07:48 PM
How is this motherboard? Intel board inside.. sspiro General Hardware Discussion 5 01-16-2005 02:16 PM
Micro ATX / Mini ITX (AMD, Intel, VIA) wanjer Newbie 2 09-11-2004 08:31 AM
Whats better: Matrox Millenium g450 or Intel 845G integrated AGP4X video controller? psyclobe General Hardware Discussion 2 10-24-2003 10:28 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 1999 - 2008 Mp3Car.com Inc.Ad Management by RedTyger
Message Board Statistics