|
 |
|
06-14-2008, 12:51 PM
|
#46
|
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 16
|
btw could someone please explain how to adjust the volume on this. can it just be done with the normal volume bar in windows xp?
|
|
|
|
Sponsored links
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
06-14-2008, 12:55 PM
|
#47
|
|
Constant Bitrate
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Lakeville, MN
Posts: 120
|
CD audio is 16 bit as well. In fact cd readers are only able to read @ 16bit. There is no shame in 16bit. lol. Why do you think there is an everlasting argument on Head-fi.com about whether there is an audible difference between 16/24 bit. The importance here is that an outboard DAC eliminates a lot of the problems carputer users encounter with other forms of sound output (hardware noise, jitter and weak output) and the Bloat is the best value in a DAC available right now. My $.02
|
|
|
06-14-2008, 12:55 PM
|
#48
|
|
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 47
|
Quote: Originally Posted by dosquito 
btw could someone please explain how to adjust the volume on this. can it just be done with the normal volume bar in windows xp?
Gotta read the thread
|
|
|
06-14-2008, 01:44 PM
|
#49
|
|
Maximum Bitrate
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 506
|
Quote: Originally Posted by t3sn4f2 
Now this has me worried. Volume control in Vista is excellent when coupled to a "24bit DAC". Would the Bloat be able to achieve this level of fidelity with regard to volume control?
I wish Brent would come by and help clear this up a bit 
Should be fine with the Bloat also seeing as Vista does not use the same audio scheme as XP.
I am just trying to clear up the fact that the Bloat does not do 24bit audio (limited by the receiver) even though the DAC chip is capable of it.
All the USB DACs I have use the PCM2707/2706 and I think it does just fine as a receiver. The PCM1794 is a really good DAC, so the Bloat should sound really good as long as the I/V stage is properly implemented.
I hope I didn't scare anyone away because this does seem like a pretty good little package for the price.
__________________
2007 Tahoe
Opus with iBase 896 and Pentium M 735 Transflective Xenarc Alpine DVA-9861, PXA-H900, Sinfoni 45X2 (2) 90x2, Genesis Dual Mono, JL 1000/1 (2), Focal Be tweeters, ScanSpeak Revelator Mids, Dynaudio MW170, Dayton 12" Ref.
My Install
|
|
|
06-14-2008, 02:00 PM
|
#50
|
|
Constant Bitrate
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Lakeville, MN
Posts: 120
|
Quote: Originally Posted by dosquito 
btw could someone please explain how to adjust the volume on this. can it just be done with the normal volume bar in windows xp?
Yes indeed it can be controlled with windows sliders and thru your front end if it controls the wave line (roadrunner and others do- if yourd doesn't it can be modified..)
|
|
|
06-14-2008, 02:05 PM
|
#51
|
|
Constant Bitrate
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Lakeville, MN
Posts: 120
|
Quote: Originally Posted by Naamanf 
Should be fine with the Bloat also seeing as Vista does not use the same audio scheme as XP.
I am just trying to clear up the fact that the Bloat does not do 24bit audio (limited by the receiver) even though the DAC chip is capable of it.
All the USB DACs I have use the PCM2707/2706 and I think it does just fine as a receiver. The PCM1794 is a really good DAC, so the Bloat should sound really good as long as the I/V stage is properly implemented.
I hope I didn't scare anyone away because this does seem like a pretty good little package for the price.
Thanks for clearing this up. Most DAC's that are 24bit are limited in the same way, but stilled called 24 bit. I'm not trying to mislead anybody :/ If you are ripping CD's to your comp through the cd drive or even playing right thru the CD drive then you are limited to 16 bit anyways. I think DVD audio is all that exceeds 16bit. This will sound awesome with vista -better than XP even. Sounds great with Macs too.
|
|
|
06-16-2008, 07:30 AM
|
#52
|
|
Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 42
|
Firstly I will clear up the discussion by saying the Bloat uses a 24bit DAC and a 16bit receiver which it is limited by. Essentially 8bits of the DAC are not used. Now the next question that everyone asks is does this degrade or improve the performance. After numourous tests with other DACs and positive testimony, I believe it does not.
So for the next question, what does effect a DACs output. The contributing factors that make an excellent DAC in my opnion are the DACs design topology, its dynamic range, the source type, the output current and the power supply filtering. I wont talk about all of these but I will mention two, the source is I2S which has no jitter unlike SPDIF and as for the power supply there is roughly 5 times the required capacitance. The PCM1794 is one of the best DACs available, last time I checked the 2nd cheapest commerical DAC that uses this chip was about $600.
P.S. The DAC will work just as well with Vista as it does XP and vice versa.
|
|
|
06-16-2008, 10:14 AM
|
#53
|
|
Constant Bitrate
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Lakeville, MN
Posts: 120
|
Thanks Brent for clearing that up! You the man!!!
|
|
|
|
Sponsored links
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
06-16-2008, 10:37 AM
|
#54
|
|
Variable Bitrate
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 302
|
By having to split the output to multiply channels, wouldn't right there be losing a tremendous amount of sound quality. Not to mention a seperate sub channel that is non-existent.
|
|
|
06-16-2008, 11:02 AM
|
#55
|
|
Constant Bitrate
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Lakeville, MN
Posts: 120
|
Quote: Originally Posted by Autockr989 
By having to split the output to multiply channels, wouldn't right there be losing a tremendous amount of sound quality. Not to mention a seperate sub channel that is non-existent.
No you wouldn't lose sound quality by splitting, and you want the sub channel to be separate because you want separate volume control for it? If thats the case you can split the signal and add an RCA level controller to the sub line. Or use this nifty device: http://cgi.ebay.com/JL-AUDIO-CL-RLC-...d=p3286.c0.m14 Its what I'm using. It gives you 2 pair of outputs from 1 input- 1 pair is volume controlled (your sub line) and one is fixed.. Or use 2 Bloats!
Last edited by amapro704; 06-16-2008 at 11:05 AM.
|
|
|
06-16-2008, 03:51 PM
|
#56
|
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 16
|
could we get an update on how many orders there have been?
|
|
|
06-17-2008, 09:58 AM
|
#57
|
|
Variable Bitrate
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 360
|
Just put my order in come on people lets make this happen!
|
|
|
06-17-2008, 10:50 AM
|
#58
|
|
Constant Bitrate
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Lakeville, MN
Posts: 120
|
The group buy has been open for 1 week and we have 12 orders. So we still need more! For only one week we are moving along great. I need help spreading the word, anyone with any ideas just make it happen. Put posts and links up wherever you deem appropriate. Bottom line is it wont be hard to fill the rest of the orders if we get this out beyond just our community. And if we are 4 or 5 short, I'll just buy them. I know once this is over, there will be more positive testimonials out there and people will be wishing they had one so having a couple extras might not be a bad idea!
|
|
|
06-17-2008, 11:11 AM
|
#59
|
|
Maximum Bitrate
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Boston
Posts: 789
|
Quote: Originally Posted by amapro704 
Quote: Originally Posted by Autockr989 
By having to split the output to multiply channels, wouldn't right there be losing a tremendous amount of sound quality. Not to mention a seperate sub channel that is non-existent.
No you wouldn't lose sound quality by splitting, and you want the sub channel to be separate because you want separate volume control for it? If thats the case you can split the signal and add an RCA level controller to the sub line. Or use this nifty device: http://cgi.ebay.com/JL-AUDIO-CL-RLC-...d=p3286.c0.m14 Its what I'm using. It gives you 2 pair of outputs from 1 input- 1 pair is volume controlled (your sub line) and one is fixed.. Or use 2 Bloats!
both of those options would work fine. if you want even more audio control then you could get an in-dash equalizer. I use a Clarion EQS-746 1/2-DIN equalizer in my setup. it has 2 sets of RCA inputs (main and aux) and 3 sets of RCA outputs (front, rear, and subwoofer). master volume control raises/lowers all levels, but each output's level can be controlled independently (via fader and sub level controls).
this best thing about units like this is that all controls are physical hardware knobs. no need to use the touchscreen/software to control volume and EQ levels. it also boosts the pre-amp output voltage up to 7v RMS, so your amp won't have to work as hard.
|
|
|
06-17-2008, 12:25 PM
|
#60
|
|
Constant Bitrate
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Lakeville, MN
Posts: 120
|
Quote: Originally Posted by FusionFanatic 
both of those options would work fine. if you want even more audio control then you could get an in-dash equalizer. I use a Clarion EQS-746 1/2-DIN equalizer in my setup. it has 2 sets of RCA inputs (main and aux) and 3 sets of RCA outputs (front, rear, and subwoofer). master volume control raises/lowers all levels, but each output's level can be controlled independently (via fader and sub level controls).
this best thing about units like this is that all controls are physical hardware knobs. no need to use the touchscreen/software to control volume and EQ levels. it also boosts the pre-amp output voltage up to 7v RMS, so your amp won't have to work as hard.

That is another great suggestion, and as a matter of fact I have one sitting right next to me collecting dust! They are sweet becasue you have separate and easy to get to adjustments for everything... Do you want mine??
|
|
|
|
Sponsored links
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:26 AM.
| |