Welcome to the MP3Car.com forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. Registering will also remove advertisements. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
|
11-16-2003, 10:37 PM
|
#1
|
|
Constant Bitrate
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Tennessee
Vehicle: 1996 Ford Ranger
Posts: 137
|
Future automotive technologies
This is a good read about new computer-based technologies that may be added to new cars in the future.
http://www.businessweek.com/technolo...5514_tc127.htm
Personally, I'm all for technology-enhanced cars (isn't that what this forum is all about?). I only hope that auto makers can be certain that the computerized functions of their cars are just as reliable as the mechanical functions. Who would want to be stranded somewhere just because some little chip in the car failed and it completly won't run?
What do you guys/gals think about these upcoming changes?
__________________
Rudy Green[e]
guess Rudy's location and win fifty bucks!
new every week at www.RudyGreene.com
|
|
|
11-17-2003, 12:50 PM
|
#2
|
|
Maximum Bitrate
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN USA
Vehicle: 2000 Audi A4 Avant 1.8t quattro
Posts: 522
|
Some of our cars are already full of little chips that could cause our car not to run. If my ECU failed my car would not run. If my tiptronic control unit failed I could not change gears...
Car are keeping less and less mechanics each release. Valves are now electronically controlled, as are gauges, engine timing and fuel mixture ratios... It's not like car manufacturer's are noobs when it comes to computers.
__________________
Car: 2000 Audi A4 Avant 1.8t
Carputer 2.0: M10000, 512 ddr2100, Xenarc 7", Opus 150W
Audio: Hifonics ZX6400, Hifonics ZX4000, Infinity Kappa Perfect 5.1 front, Hifonics Zeus ZS62CX 6.6" rear, Infinity Perfect 10.1 Sub
Complete: [0%-------X-100%]
|
|
|
11-23-2003, 11:00 PM
|
#3
|
|
Constant Bitrate
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Orange County, NY
Vehicle: 2002 VW GTI
Posts: 162
|
I hear alot about the automotive industry pushing to switch over to 40 or 42volt systems in cars. Any idea when this will happen? I have been reading / hearing about it for years and it doesn't seem like any current vehicles on the road use this.
When and if this does happen, imagine how much easier it will be to design / build DC-DC PSU's !! 
|
|
|
11-23-2003, 11:34 PM
|
#4
|
|
Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tampa, FL
Vehicle: 92 Celica
Posts: 8
|
40 or 42V systems thats a lot of power just imagine how much it will cost you to replace a battery.
|
|
|
11-24-2003, 12:34 AM
|
#5
|
|
Raw Wave
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London UK
Vehicle: 1992 Ford XR2i
Posts: 1,818
|
I hear alot about the automotive industry pushing to switch over to 40 or 42volt systems in cars.
Did they say the reason why?
|
|
|
11-24-2003, 01:47 AM
|
#6
|
|
Maximum Bitrate
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Meridian, Mississippi
Vehicle: 89 Firebird Formula 350
Posts: 605
|
spark? more power? bigger fuses?
and my all time favorite
"what you only have a 12v system in there? Ha! 42v be-atch!"
__________________
"You anit leading but two things Jack and **** and Jack left town"
"Just When You Think You Forget About a Chick She Pops Up Like a Case of Herpes Simplex B"
Ask Me About Hubernate!
|
|
|
11-24-2003, 02:04 AM
|
#7
|
|
Maximum Bitrate
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: CT
Vehicle: 02 WRX
Posts: 754
|
well..
V * A = W
so keeping the same amount of power but raising the volts would require less amps. for example..
12v * 100a = 1200w
or
40v * 30a = 1200w
there was a discussion about this in the caraudio.com forums about a year or so ago...we basically decided that since cars are going towards being more controlled electrically than mechanically, the more power, the better. im searching for the thread but i cant seem to find it...
|
|
|
11-24-2003, 02:50 AM
|
#8
|
|
Constant Bitrate
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: TN
Vehicle: 1998 Mecury Mountaineer
Posts: 196
|
Quote: Originally Posted by Ricky327
I hear alot about the automotive industry pushing to switch over to 40 or 42volt systems in cars.
Did they say the reason why?
One thing it allows you do is have smaller gauge wire to run everything. This is why airplanes use 24 V battery system to reduce weight in the wiring. And "Power" of a battery really depends more on size/construction than the voltage of the battery. So I would not think that a 42 volt battery(assuming same size/construction) would not have any more power than the standard 12 volt car battery.
Quincy
|
|
|
11-24-2003, 06:52 AM
|
#9
|
|
Constant Bitrate
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Orange County, NY
Vehicle: 2002 VW GTI
Posts: 162
|
Quote: Originally Posted by edgie345
40 or 42V systems thats a lot of power just imagine how much it will cost you to replace a battery.
I don't imagine the 40 or 42 volt battery costing that much more than a 12 volt battery today. Initially the prices might be higher, but in the end it's mass production that will bring the cost down.
|
|
|
11-24-2003, 09:25 AM
|
#10
|
|
Raw Wave
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London UK
Vehicle: 1992 Ford XR2i
Posts: 1,818
|
Ok I get the idea of increasing the voltage would require less current for the same amount of power and also thiner wire. But its not as if the car is 1 mile long to have significant effect.
I sure agree with the idea on aeroplane and power station with weight and distance problems.
Car electronics dont use much power either. The only things that uses the most power is the starter motor, heater and head lights...they are about a few foot away from the battery.
Im sure theres more reason into it. My thinking is they wanna reduce the cost of the wirings.
A 42V batery should cost alot more than a 12V...its just the way they are constructed as they need more cells...more plates. Unless theres a new type of battery.
How about the rest of the car parts? they all need to be redesigned to take 42V. Car manufacturers hardly make their own electrical parts.
|
|
|
11-25-2003, 01:51 AM
|
#11
|
|
9 Fingered Administrator Lesbian
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ruston, LA
Vehicle: 1998 Ranger/1991 Sunbird
Posts: 9,852
|
Quote: Originally Posted by Ricky327
A 42V batery should cost alot more than a 12V...its just the way they are constructed as they need more cells...more plates. Unless theres a new type of battery.
How about the rest of the car parts? they all need to be redesigned to take 42V. Car manufacturers hardly make their own electrical parts.
Not necessarily, more plates yes, but if the current form factor is kept, the plates will be smaller. I imagine they might go a little bigger with the batteries, but not by much.
The rest of the car parts, well many of the components in your car already run on way less than 12v, it's just a matter of stepping things down.
__________________
FrodoPlayer.com
TeaBaggins.com
[H]4 Life
My next generation Front End is right on schedule.
It will be done sometime in the next generation.
I'm a lesbian too.
I am for hire!
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:32 PM.
|
|