|
 |
|
06-19-2005, 01:10 PM
|
#1
|
|
Variable Bitrate
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 259
|
iGuidance issues
I'm new here, but have searched the forums for any relating topic and found nothing.
In iGuidance 2.1, i have this issue when taking on particular exit by my home. The off-ramp runs nearly parallel to the highway, so when I turn (as indicated by the route) the program thinks I am still on the highway. It then recalculates instead of telling me what to do at the end of the ramp. Has anyone heard/seen this before. Any fix? Perhapse there is a way to put a delay on a recalcualtion would fix this??
Also, the program seems to be very innacurate with the POIs. Very often it will tell me that the location is on the wrong side of the street. When plotting to a large shopping plaza, the program has NO idea where the entrance is.
The program does not seem to have an way of modifying any settings to fix any of these issues. I'm hoping someone has had some luck with a resource hacking program or something.
Scott
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
Sponsored links
|
06-19-2005, 01:32 PM
|
#2
|
|
Maximum Bitrate
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 530
|
Sorry dude,
Running parallel to the freeway - that's partially GPS and partially iG. Remember that "accuracy" spec for your GPS receiver? It's coming into play now. iG is being told that you're over there, so it routes you from over there. The data in iG may also be incorrect and thus plots you incorrectly.
As far as accuracy, the map data comes from NavTech, so take it up with them. Normally, a city block is located by GPS coordinates on the corners, and each street is given a range of numbers spaced along the street, so like Main St on this block is from 1000 to 2000. It doesn't tell you driveways or entrances, just approximate location.
Hope this helps,
-psyrex
|
|
|
06-19-2005, 09:00 PM
|
#3
|
|
Maximum Bitrate
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 855
|
I've seen a few unusual things the routes in iG have told me. I was driving down Hwy 190. iG told me to take the W.S. Young exit and then get right back on the highway. I guess the maps aren't up-to-date in my area. I'll take routes that iG does not want me to take and it'll get all ****ed off at me.
"DING. When possible make a U-turn. DING." Stupid program. Be quiet.
Another thing to remember is you probably won't get any closer than +/-5m accuracy. That's about 15 feet. Plus, iG "snaps" to roads thinking you are on it due to the accuracy. Only thing I can suggest is take the exit slower...
Derek
__________________
Progress [||-------]
View my Worklog to see some of my progress.
Downgraded Progress - Starting with another car... 09/13/06
Last edited by d_sellers1; 06-19-2005 at 09:02 PM.
|
|
|
06-20-2005, 06:06 AM
|
#4
|
|
Maximum Bitrate
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 842
|
Quote: Originally Posted by d_sellers1
"DING. When possible make a U-turn. DING."
Yes, a lot of users in the past have brought up the issue of excessive U-turn suggestions by iGuidance after drivers deviate from the plotted route. I personally feel I do want U-turns if they are reasonable, and I really don't mind even a hundred of them in a row if they are really making any sense. But it has been documented that many (perhaps most) U-turn prompts we get when we don't follow the calculated route is because iGuidance automatically recalculates only a portion of the route and in so doing it is just attempting to bring us back to the originally plotted route instead of generating a new optimal route by calculating a completely new route from where we are all the way to our destination.
This automatic re-calculating of just a small potion (as opposed to the full) route is there to increase the speed of auto-recalc. The speed is of the essence if you are using iGuidance on a PDA, but a PC user should really not notice any slowdown when FULL recalc is implemented.
There is a very easy registry tweak to force iGuidance to do a FULL recalc. Check the following link. Read the post in the middle of the page. (The post with the naked lady picture.)
Link: http://www.gpspassion.com/forumsen/t...66&whichpage=4
Quote: Originally Posted by d_sellers1
Stupid program. Be quiet.
The above tweak only works for the newest iGuidance 2.1.1. In older versions, when I wanted to drive "my way" instead of the "iGuidance way" I would just use the Mute function.
Last edited by Marvin Hlavac; 06-20-2005 at 06:11 AM.
|
|
|
06-20-2005, 01:56 PM
|
#5
|
|
Calm Down Or Get A 2 Week Vacation -Love The Forum Policeman
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,604
|
Quote: Originally Posted by Marvin Hlavac
Yes, a lot of users in the past have brought up the issue of excessive U-turn suggestions by iGuidance after drivers deviate from the plotted route. I personally feel I do want U-turns if they are reasonable, and I really don't mind even a hundred of them in a row if they are really making any sense. But it has been documented that many (perhaps most) U-turn prompts we get when we don't follow the calculated route is because iGuidance automatically recalculates only a portion of the route and in so doing it is just attempting to bring us back to the originally plotted route instead of generating a new optimal route by calculating a completely new route from where we are all the way to our destination.
This automatic re-calculating of just a small potion (as opposed to the full) route is there to increase the speed of auto-recalc. The speed is of the essence if you are using iGuidance on a PDA, but a PC user should really not notice any slowdown when FULL recalc is implemented.
There is a very easy registry tweak to force iGuidance to do a FULL recalc. Check the following link. Read the post in the middle of the page. (The post with the naked lady picture.)
Link: http://www.gpspassion.com/forumsen/t...66&whichpage=4
The above tweak only works for the newest iGuidance 2.1.1. In older versions, when I wanted to drive "my way" instead of the "iGuidance way" I would just use the Mute function.
Marvin, great insight.
I would just like to add that IG, and all mapping and navi programs are not perfect. First of all, as stated before, GPS is not 100 percent accurate. It has a range of accuracy, I would say +-5 meters, which is like 13 feet. It is not something that can be avoided. It was much worse back in the day when I started with Navigation software, when the government still had SA Turned on.
Next, running a route on a Navi program is not always gonna be the "best". I recently read an article of someone testing a navigation program in NYC. He used the routing function to plan a trip from his office to his house. He complained that the program did not know that one of the streets near his office had timed streetlights, and was therefore much fater then the street that the program had chosen for him to take. And that is the difference. Routing is done by parameters, generally the shortest distance. At this point, Navigation can not tell you which streets have more cogestion then others (Even though you and I know that some streets do have more congestion then others) and it can't know "shortcuts", and it doesn;t have any idea that between 6 and 10 at night, 3rd avenue has times streetlight goin uptown while the FDR drive is a parking lot, but that during the middle of the day, 3rd avenue is bumper to bumper while te Drive is free and clear, and things like that. Navigation is for getting places that you have no idea how to get to. If you knew how to get there, then you don't need the routing of a Navi Program. Navi will get you there, even if it is not what might be the "Best" way to do it. Sometimes when I am in a place that I am not familiar with, and I want to get home, I will just hit the home button, and once I am on a freeway that I recognize, turn of the Navi, cause I know how to get home from there. NAVI is great for the places you are unfamiliar with.
Marvin, I wonder since I know you have done the complete recalc registry tweak, if you have noticed that the U-Turn prompts have been reduced or eliminated. If you have, let us know. If not, I may be doing some testing soon to check it out.
Michael
Last edited by Wiredwrx; 06-20-2005 at 02:00 PM.
|
|
|
06-20-2005, 04:13 PM
|
#6
|
|
Maximum Bitrate
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 842
|
* * * Click to enlarge * * *
The above is a sample of what you can experience before and after the registry tweak ;-)
|
|
|
06-20-2005, 04:28 PM
|
#7
|
|
Calm Down Or Get A 2 Week Vacation -Love The Forum Policeman
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,604
|
Quote: Originally Posted by Marvin Hlavac
* * * Click to enlarge * * *
The above is a sample of what you can experience before and after the registry tweak ;-)
SAWEET. Time to hack away at the registry.
Michael
__________________
...I love the French language...especially to curse with...Nom de Dieu de putain de bordel de merde de saloperies de connards d'enculés de ta mère. You see, it's like wiping your *** with silk, I love it. www.yellinlawoffice.com
|
|
|
06-20-2005, 04:44 PM
|
#8
|
|
Maximum Bitrate
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 842
|
Yes, once you try it you will wonder how you were able to live without it ;-)
...and one more pic:
* * * Click to enlarge * * *
|
|
|
06-20-2005, 05:32 PM
|
#9
|
|
Maximum Bitrate
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 855
|
Unfortunately, I can't use this hack. When I get back from Iraq, I'll purchase the newest version of iG but until then I'm gonna keep playing with my version of 2.0.
Derek
__________________
Progress [||-------]
View my Worklog to see some of my progress.
Downgraded Progress - Starting with another car... 09/13/06
|
|
|
06-20-2005, 06:21 PM
|
#10
|
|
Maximum Bitrate
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 842
|
Sorry to hear that. I'd recommend one little add-on I developed that manually forces FULL recalc (a click of a keyboard key), but that doesn't function without a keyboard...
Yes, 2.1.1 upgrade is the only option for now :-(
|
|
|
06-20-2005, 06:32 PM
|
#11
|
|
Raw Wave
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,453
|
One of you knowledgable guys should do an "iGuidance Hack" writeup for the FAQ Emporium section.
|
|
|
06-21-2005, 06:03 AM
|
#12
|
|
Maximum Bitrate
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 842
|
Things change too much from one version to another...
|
|
|
06-21-2005, 08:03 AM
|
#13
|
|
Raw Wave
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,453
|
Especially because of that..
|
|
|
06-22-2005, 05:33 AM
|
#14
|
|
Maximum Bitrate
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 842
|
You do have a valid point. But it just looks like too much work. Take the above mentioned Recalc Registry Tweak for instance. A month or two ago, when 2.1 came out, it wasn't possible. Now, 2.1.1 just came out and we can do it. I suspect when the next release of iGuidance comes out, it will no longer be necessary to do the tweak because by then the programmers will have fine-tuned the re-calculation algorithm of iGuidance (likely).
(But, of course, that's just the lazy nature of mine analyzing this. LOL) The STICKY in this part of the forum is a great source of tweaks and ideas. And also you may look here: > click<
|
|
|
06-22-2005, 08:09 AM
|
#15
|
|
Raw Wave
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,453
|
Quote: Originally Posted by Marvin Hlavac
But it just looks like too much work.
Hehe, I understand, it really does seem like an awful lot of work.
It would just be nice to have all the info in one place.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored links
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:07 AM.
| |