|
 |
06-29-2005, 09:51 AM
|
#2
|
|
Low Bitrate
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 89
|
I'd Be Interested Also
__________________
SEND GAY PORN HERE
|
|
|
|
06-29-2005, 04:06 PM
|
#3
|
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2
|
Well im not going to buy it this week. if there is another one on there next week i will buy it and give you guys a review.
|
|
|
|
|
06-29-2005, 04:12 PM
|
#4
|
|
Low Bitrate
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lee, NH
Posts: 71
|
I love the marketing with the very small hand to make it appear so large.
__________________
Joshua Jones - New Folk Singer Songwriter & Web Site Design (Yep, that's what it says)
Plans:
Micro ATX MB, 1.6 Ghz AMD AthlonXP-M, 512MB RAM, 20G 2.5" HD, Thinline DVD, 10" Touchscreen Display (Front)
Web Log
|
|
|
|
|
08-04-2005, 01:46 AM
|
#5
|
|
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 13
|
any news?
hey just wondering if there was any news on this screen and its quality, i've been trying to find info on it but there isn't anything i can find either and there's one on ebay australia atm for $250 including postage which is $150 cheaper than a lilliput. while i would like the higher res of the lilliput i dont think its worth that much difference if thats the main difference. if no one knows anything about them i might end up getting one and i'll post up what i think about it but i'd have nothing to compare it to.
i assume the native resolution is that actual number of pixals and if the recommened resolution is higher than the native res then its resizing it? if so then why would you get a better result doing it this way?
how come none of the screens run that high a resolution? i'm planning on doing an incar computer as a stepup from my asus pda which only had a 3.6" screen but it ran VGA res so all these 8" screens seem kinda crap in comparison
thanks -evan
|
|
|
|
|
08-04-2005, 02:05 AM
|
#6
|
|
The Lavender Tie Just
Made It Obvious
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Bonita, CA (Hop, Skip, and a Jump from Tijuana, Mexico)
Posts: 3,075
|
http://cgi.ebay.fr/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?...category=73588
Not bad, can someone tell me how much that is in $?
Peace,
Rafster
|
|
|
|
|
08-04-2005, 08:53 AM
|
#7
|
|
Constant Bitrate
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 182
|
a few things i noticed about it.
1. its only 640x480 native res
2. the brightness is about half of your standard lilliput
for the price though, doesnt look too bad...
|
|
|
|
|
08-04-2005, 09:01 AM
|
#8
|
|
FLAC
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maine
Posts: 937
|
Quote: Originally Posted by Rafster
come on, man... XE.com
89.99 EUR = 110.907 USD
sounds pretty sketchy though... it says it has a VGA input but everything else suggests it's a regular composite screen. If they're not lying about the VGA input, it's probably a VGA to composite adapter or something... There's no such thing as a free lunch, and by the same token, I have a strong feeling there's no such thing as a $110 8" VGA screen 
__________________
But don't take it from me! here's a quote from a real, live newbie:
Quote: Originally Posted by Viscouse
I am learning buttloads just by searching on this forum. I've learned 2 big things so far: 1-it's been done before, and 2-if it hasn't, there is a way to do it.
eegeek.net
|
|
|
|
|
08-04-2005, 10:05 AM
|
#9
|
|
_
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Little Elm, Texas
Posts: 13,361
|
Quote: Originally Posted by homchz
I love the marketing with the very small hand to make it appear so large.
I was looking through the pics and noticed that as well....
I was like WAIT a second! that's only an 8" screen! who has a hand that small!!!?? 
|
|
|
|
|
Sponsored links
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:36 AM.
| |
BelCanto 8" screens?
or 
. Anyone know anything about it?
