Quote:
I am going to install Fedora Core 6 on my second computer to learn how it works and get a feel for Linux. When Fedora Core and Linux ICE are lined up for comparison, why choose one over the other for in car use? I assume that Linux Ice is tailored to make it ideal for a carputer, but I am not exactly sure how. I'm not trying to cause your distro to compete with another, I simply wish to know the apples and oranges of Fedora Core vs. Linux ICE.
The main goals of Linux ICE are to provide a car PC friendly distribution. We wanted to make a distro that made all the things that troubled car PC users easier. Things like touchscreen integration and providing a minimalistic environment that is flexible enough for almost anyone are a must have for a car PC operating system. We are basically building a distro with all of the things that car PC users will need and want. Things like:
-built in touchscreen support
-built in suspend2 (faster and more efficient hibernate/resume)
-the excellent hardware support of the ubuntu linux distro (Linux ICE is based on ubuntu)
-integrated frontend (with mp3, ogg, flac, and numerous other codec support)
-gps apps
-bluetooth phone support (there are great individuals working on it, we hope to be able to include it in Linux ICE when it is ready).
The advantage of Linux ICE over something like Fedora is that Linux ICE comes with everything that car PC need out of the box. Linux ICE is also less bloated (a single install cd compared to numerous cds for FC6) which makes for easier installation on a CF disk drive. The tools for customizing ubuntu are very handy also. It would take several hours (if not a whole day) to build a fedora distro from source. Using tools like reconstructor, we can make a liveCD in a fraction of the time. This makes development easier and faster (can you imagine having compiled a whole distro overnight and then realizing that you installed something incorrectly?).
More details about what we are doing can be found on the Linux ICE homepage and in the forums.