Windows Media Player 9 or 10?

AllShowNoGo · 12-24-2006, 05:06 PM

Which uses less system resources? Which one runs smoother with MI? Thanks!

reddeath30 · 12-25-2006, 06:08 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by AllShowNoGo

Which uses less system resources? Which one runs smoother with MI? Thanks!

Theyre both pretty much the same, but I have seen smoother performance in 3rd party visualizations in version 10

2k1Toaster · 12-25-2006, 06:11 PM

9 an 10 are equal. 11 is bloated but much nicer looking. Classic of course is the best performance wise.

AllShowNoGo · 12-26-2006, 01:27 AM

I'm running a 933mhz p3 with a basic no frills on board graphics card and will be upgrading to 256 or 512mb of ram. I disabled full screen mode and it runs pretty smoothly now. I've just gotten bored with the visuals and I highly doubt my carputer will be able to run g-force (third party plugin).

reddeath30 · 12-26-2006, 11:43 AM

Quote: Originally Posted by AllShowNoGo

I'm running a 933mhz p3 with a basic no frills on board graphics card and will be upgrading to 256 or 512mb of ram. I disabled full screen mode and it runs pretty smoothly now. I've just gotten bored with the visuals and I highly doubt my carputer will be able to run g-force (third party plugin).

I would definitely recommend going to at least 256mb ram. The next release of Mobile Impact will also need a somewhat decent graphics card. One that has at least 32Mb ram on it.