Mp3car Home Page The mp3Car.com Forums The mp3Car.com Store The mp3Car.com Blog About mp3Car.com    

Sponsored links

Go Back   MP3Car.com > Mp3Car Technical > Power Supplies

Notices

Reply
 
Share Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-10-2003, 01:56 PM   #1
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: CA
Posts: 13
What is power consumption of...

typical PCs...
Say P4 2.4 system, Athlon XP 1700+, M10000
when it goes under standby mode?
I would think it would be better method of getting system ready up in short time (practically instantly) but worried about possible battery drain.
TIA.
jinu117 is offline   Reply With Quote
Advertisement
 
Advertisement
Sponsored links

Old 01-08-2004, 08:21 PM   #2
Variable Bitrate
 
kiztope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: In the car
Posts: 426
no one knows?
I'd like to know this too...
kiztope is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2004, 08:43 PM   #3
Variable Bitrate
 
MeanGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Melbourne, Florida
Posts: 377
When I measured my Epia's power consumption on standby, it drew about 500ma directly from the purple +5v wire from the power supply.
__________________
My OLD Carputer: http://www.mp3car.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=17412
Currently, Don't have a carputer :( I sold my lincoln and bought a '93 Acura Vigor, plan on putting a carputer in it one of these days. You can see my vigor at: This Site
MeanGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2004, 09:11 PM   #4
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Delaware
Posts: 36
I think you would be better off using Hibernation mode (if you can). It writes the info from your ram to the hardrive and shuts off (takes about 5-10 seconds). Then when you power back on it takes the saved ram info and puts it back into memory so it is exactly where you "left off" when you put it into hibernation. I like it better than Standby, and it doesn't draw any more power than having the computer off!
SpeedFreak03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2004, 11:31 PM   #5
Mr. Wiggles
 
shakes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 1,064
I agree with speedfreak ... the amount of extra time needed to bring the pc out of hibernate rather than standby is minimal ... and hibernate takes the same amount of power as when the pc is turned off. standby requires a significantly larger amount of power.
__________________
My JeepPC Install

"there are no stupid questions, just stupid people."

"it's been agreed the whole world stinks so no one's taking showers anymore"
shakes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2004, 01:27 AM   #6
FLAC
 
robiewp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Massachusetts, US
Posts: 957
I wouldn't call it minimal. My system takes a good minute to come out of hibernate, and 7-10 secconds to come out of suspend.

true, hibernate uses no power. there's a lot to be said for this.

draw on a 'standard system'? no idear. different systems behave different ways in suspend... some keep all of the fans running (eats power), other's seem like their off save for a blinking light (in my limited experience).

My mini ITX system drew under 3amps/hour. my dual processor AMD system draws 20amps/hour

(these numbers based on monitored UPS statistics)
__________________
Use the source, Luke.
car computer rev 3: 8" lilliput and usual suspects
robiewp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2004, 11:11 AM   #7
Mr. Wiggles
 
shakes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 1,064
Quote: Originally Posted by robiewp
I wouldn't call it minimal. My system takes a good minute to come out of hibernate, and 7-10 secconds to come out of suspend.

looks like someone did some editing ... the e-mail I got said "my @$$ it's minimal..."

anyway, a one minute boot from hibernate is pretty long ... and it's probably a cause of something on your system, not hibernate itself. for me a normal boot takes about 45 seconds ... booting from hibernate takes about 20 seconds.

do you have quick post enabled in bios?
__________________
My JeepPC Install

"there are no stupid questions, just stupid people."

"it's been agreed the whole world stinks so no one's taking showers anymore"
shakes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2004, 11:36 AM   #8
FLAC
 
robiewp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Massachusetts, US
Posts: 957
Quote: Originally Posted by shakes
looks like someone did some editing ... the e-mail I got said "my @$$ it's minimal..."

I do that a lot (if it's before someone's responded to the content of the post). Sometimes I forget that there's a lot of room for offense when it's just been typed... so I proof read my post (after i've posted ) and then quickly editing it upon realizing what I typed.

Quote:
anyway, a one minute boot from hibernate is pretty long ... and it's probably a cause of something on your system, not hibernate itself. for me a normal boot takes about 45 seconds ... booting from hibernate takes about 20 seconds.

do you have quick post enabled in bios?

How much ram do you have in your system? i'm running with 512, and a 5400 rpm drive, both which could have something to do with it. I've also got devices up the wazoo. None the less, my normal boot time is very close to my hibernate-resume time.

I do have quick boot enabled in bios.

Quote:
I agree with speedfreak ... the amount of extra time needed to bring the pc out of hibernate rather than standby is minimal

I wouldn't call a difference of 1/2 to 1/3 the time minimal... though i guess we're really talking about a difference of 10-13 secconds (assuming our numbers were accurate). For me it's the difference between having the car computer rearing to go by the time my seatbelt's on, or by the time I'm down my 1000 foot driveway, or in the case of returning from say, the grocerry store, by the time i find myself ingulfed in traffic. There's nothing wrong with waiting for boot, I just find it an inconvenience.

maybe the solution is to tie the power on/off for the computer into one of the AUX connections on my remote start/alarm.....
__________________
Use the source, Luke.
car computer rev 3: 8" lilliput and usual suspects

Last edited by robiewp; 01-09-2004 at 11:39 AM.
robiewp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2004, 05:03 PM   #9
Mr. Wiggles
 
shakes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 1,064
Quote: Originally Posted by robiewp
How much ram do you have in your system? i'm running with 512, and a 5400 rpm drive, both which could have something to do with it. I've also got devices up the wazoo. None the less, my normal boot time is very close to my hibernate-resume time.

I have 256 Megs of RAM ... and a *think* a 4200 rpm drive. Your extra memory could indeed be part of the problem.

If you've had your install going for a while that could also be it ... i don't care what anybody says ... windows speed degrades over time even if nothing changes. I personally think it's a conspiracy M$ has with intel to make people think their computers are getting slower and therefore will go buy new PCs every 3-5 years.

Quote:
maybe the solution is to tie the power on/off for the computer into one of the AUX connections on my remote start/alarm.....

For you that'd be a great option. Course you want to make sure it also works if you start your car regularly.
__________________
My JeepPC Install

"there are no stupid questions, just stupid people."

"it's been agreed the whole world stinks so no one's taking showers anymore"
shakes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2004, 05:32 PM   #10
Raw Wave
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 1,818
How stable is the PC when it come out of standby?

I noticed most of the time PC crashes when woken up from standby, sometimes it wont even wake up at all.
Ricky327 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2004, 05:45 PM   #11
Constant Bitrate
 
RX7FDTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 132
So is it a mistake to buy more ram !? I bought a Gig for my M10000 cause I thought I'd do it a favor..
If you're not occuping all that ram, then it shouldn't write a gig to the drive, right ?
RX7FDTT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2004, 05:48 PM   #12
Raw Wave
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 1,818
If you're not occuping all that ram, then it shouldn't write a gig to the drive, right ?

As far as I know it write everything to your HDD.
Ricky327 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2004, 06:26 PM   #13
FLAC
 
robiewp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Massachusetts, US
Posts: 957
Quote: Originally Posted by shakes
If you've had your install going for a while that could also be it ... i don't care what anybody says ... windows speed degrades over time even if nothing changes. I personally think it's a conspiracy M$ has with intel to make people think their computers are getting slower and therefore will go buy new PCs every 3-5 years.

I don't know about the conspiracy part, but I've observed the same thing. I have norton ghost images of my system in various states, and when it starts to runs like molasis I go back to a fresh image.

Quote:
For you that'd be a great option. Course you want to make sure it also works if you start your car regularly.

but i always remote start my car

it's actually an additional button on the remote with a * on it. Since it would jsut be in parallel with the rest of the on switches, it wouldn't affect normal operations.
__________________
Use the source, Luke.
car computer rev 3: 8" lilliput and usual suspects
robiewp is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Advertisement
 
Advertisement
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 1999 - 2008 Mp3Car.com Inc.Ad Management by RedTyger
Message Board Statistics