Software Review: Windows XP Media Center 2005 Edition! - Page 10

TimmyM · 12-06-2004, 03:43 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by Defiler

And I'd be willing to bet it uses 64Meg...

that would be my guess too. I recently switched from a GeForce 4 to the GeForce 4 on the motherboard. kept getting video error messages until I went into the BIOS and changed the onboard from 32 to 64 megs and now all is well. I'm able to run something like 1600x 966 on a 51" HDTV. I can 1900 x1080 but it overscans so much I cant see the start bar.

Cyber_Drone · 12-06-2004, 10:33 PM

so.... anyway to use the epia-m boards' onboard video within MCE ?

Rover_Eli · 12-06-2004, 10:38 PM

bump - same problem as Cyber Drone

nFiniteTuning · 12-07-2004, 01:55 AM

Quote: Originally Posted by Defiler

Image burn in on your display.

I'm still unfamiliar with what your talkin about?

nFiniteTuning · 12-07-2004, 02:01 AM

Quote: Originally Posted by Cyber_Drone

so.... anyway to use the epia-m boards' onboard video within MCE ?

dont those motherboards have drivers for windows xp? If The onboard video is 64mb minimum, and you got drivers for windows XP, you shouldn't have any problem. If they are under 64 mb, you might be able to use Media Center, but your going to continue to get the video driver error.

Like some people say, its not for everyone. This program was made for people like us tho...Microsoft and Shuttle are installing Media Center XPC's into new car's like Cadi's and Mercedes.

BUT, if you can't use it...stick with MMC...soon it will be just as good as Media Center and will be more...whats the word, availible? for people with the lower powered systems. Were going to try and make MMC look and perform just like Media Center, but with less requirements.

lez · 12-07-2004, 03:14 PM

So if I am reading this thread right, my 32mb card is dead as far as mce2k5 is concerned?

Ok so now that I need a new card, what can I buy that works as good as my matrox marvel, slow card, but 100% stable with 2nd monitor composite out that _stays_ full screen when asked even if you crash something on screen 1.

Most cards I have tried have been nvidia (my friends nvidia mad he's a games player) never stay full screen on 2nd screen out(tv) if you start doing lots of work / mouse clicking on screen 1

Unless you know different...........

tbird2340 · 12-07-2004, 03:18 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by lez

So if I am reading this thread right, my 32mb card is dead as far as mce2k5 is concerned?

Just try yours to see if it works. I'm read in forums people using 32MB cards successfully.

TimmyM · 12-07-2004, 03:58 PM

I've never tried to run it on two monitors. I used a GeForce4 MX 128mb from eVGA. Cheapest card I could get with DVI out. Think it was like $55. It has VGA, DVI and Svideo out. I'm sure you could run two monitors with the VGA and DVI. Not sure what happens when you try using the VGA and Svideo at the same time. I was very happy with it but ended up going with the GeForce4 with DVI that was on my motherboard. Which works just as well AFTER I changed the onboard video from 32mb to 64mb.

BE SURE TO DOWNLOAD THE NVIDIA MCE DRIVERS!

nFiniteTuning · 12-07-2004, 05:04 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by lez

So if I am reading this thread right, my 32mb card is dead as far as mce2k5 is concerned?

Ok so now that I need a new card, what can I buy that works as good as my matrox marvel, slow card, but 100% stable with 2nd monitor composite out that _stays_ full screen when asked even if you crash something on screen 1.

Most cards I have tried have been nvidia (my friends nvidia mad he's a games player) never stay full screen on 2nd screen out(tv) if you start doing lots of work / mouse clicking on screen 1

Unless you know different...........

You should try Media Center 2004. Its not much different.

Cyber_Drone · 12-07-2004, 06:11 PM

I dont get an error, just video playback doesnt work within the media center gui. it works with media player (standalone)

Defiler · 12-07-2004, 11:17 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by NightFireTuning

I'm still unfamiliar with what your talkin about?

It is the real reason for screen savers. If you leave an image on a screen for long enough that image will create an silhouette and will be present at all times. Hence the term "burn in". It burns the image into the display. Not as common as it used to be but it does happen. Search "Jurasic AND lilliput" on these forums and you will see what I mean.

TimmyM · 12-07-2004, 11:26 PM

Quote: Originally Posted by Defiler

It is the real reason for screen savers. If you leave an image on a screen for long enough that image will create an silhouette and will be present at all times. Hence the term "burn in". It burns the image into the display. Not as common as it used to be but it does happen. Search "Jurasic AND lilliput" on these forums and you will see what I mean.

Also plasma tv's can be burned. But I'm not sure this is the reason for the moving background. Think about it, why move the background but not the menu icons? it's the icons and station ID's like the CNN icon in the lower righthand corner that are going to do the most burning, or at least show up the most. I've got the feeling it's for looks more then burn.

Krusher · 12-25-2004, 02:50 AM

has anyone tried using media center on a laptop?

I have a C600 with a onboard 8MB video card.......

lawrence · 12-25-2004, 04:35 AM

runnig on my compaq p3 433 runs ok
laptop came with ME yuck!
switch to xp pro ran ok but couldn't use volume or scroll buttons
switched to media center 2004 and now volume works but still no scroll
run a little faster with mc , but any version of xp will be too slow imho.

werdna · 03-28-2006, 08:53 AM

I got a question....what does MCE look like on a laptop/notebook?

Anyone know where i can find screenshots?

Cheers,

Werdna xx

User Name		Remember Me?
Password