|
 |
|
07-11-2006, 08:17 PM
|
#151
|
|
Variable Bitrate
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 299
|
Ok, so if I'm at home logging on to my network with an SSID of "linksys" with no encryption. I then take off to work. In the course of driving to work, I wander into the range of someone else's "linksys" network, XP will log in automatically, without asking me.
It then continues to check for XP updates, perhaps checks email, looks for new anti-virus definations. All without my knowing.
Am I breaking the law? Is my computer breaking the law? Is Microsoft to blame?
Just some thoughts. FYI, my SSID is not "linksys" and my WiFi is encrypted and un-crackable.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored links
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
07-11-2006, 09:27 PM
|
#152
|
|
FLAC
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Anoka County, MN
Posts: 1,021
|
Quote: Originally Posted by phc
Am I breaking the law? Is my computer breaking the law? Is Microsoft to blame?
1) Yes
2) It is just doing what you told it
3) No, your ignorance is to blame.
Ignorance is no excuse for breaking a law. Of course, it is a good defense if you get caught. You still managed to break a law.
|
|
|
07-11-2006, 09:50 PM
|
#153
|
|
Maximum Bitrate
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 551
|
Okay, I'm not even a Windoze user and I know there's a checkbox to disable auto connecting.
Ignorance of the law won't get you anywhere in court. Ignorance and big tits might keep it from going that far though.
__________________
Failure is not an option....
It's installed by default on every version of Windows.
|
|
|
07-11-2006, 10:28 PM
|
#154
|
|
Variable Bitrate
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 362
|
Quote: Originally Posted by phc
Just some thoughts. FYI, my SSID is not "linksys" and my WiFi is encrypted and un-crackable.
Really? The NSA would be very interested in the particulars of your un-crackable encryption techniques. Enough time and resources and anything is possible.
__________________
Carputer Project Status:
0% - Mobo died on 2/17/08
Check out the worklog for my '01 Pathfinder.
|
|
|
07-12-2006, 04:05 AM
|
#155
|
|
Maximum Bitrate
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 551
|
Quote: Originally Posted by phc
Ok, so if I'm at home logging on to my network with an SSID of "linksys" with no encryption. I then take off to work. In the course of driving to work, I wander into the range of someone else's "linksys" network, XP will log in automatically, without asking me.
It then continues to check for XP updates, perhaps checks email, looks for new anti-virus definations. All without my knowing.
Am I breaking the law? Is my computer breaking the law? Is Microsoft to blame?
Just some thoughts. FYI, my SSID is not "linksys" and my WiFi is encrypted and un-crackable.
You're jokeing right?
__________________
Failure is not an option....
It's installed by default on every version of Windows.
|
|
|
07-12-2006, 02:38 PM
|
#156
|
|
Variable Bitrate
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 299
|
Quote: Originally Posted by BarryWoods
You're jokeing right?
Nope. I use WPA. WPA is not crackable.
WEP was a poor implementation of a solid crypto idea and therefore is crackable.
WPA is good implementation of a solid crypto idea only vunerable via brute force (would take hundred's of centuries or more) or via password guessing. WPA uses RC4 encryption in addition to TKIP (keys change over time). WPA2 uses AES - encryption used for government "Top Secret" applicaitons.
My password is generated randomonly based on this perfect password generator and additional shuffeling of bits on my end.
https://www.grc.com/passwords.htm.
So you basically end up with random password that is 256 bits - so you end up with 1x10^77 possible passwords.
My wifi router uses open-source firmware, therefore no back-doors.
Like I said, my wifi is encrypted and un-crackable.
|
|
|
07-12-2006, 02:46 PM
|
#157
|
|
Super Moderator. If my typing sucks it's probably because I'm driving....
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 6,102
|
has anyone ever even heard of a crack attempt on an indeviduals little wifi... I know tons of people who leave theres wide open & I have never heard anyone ever talk of there system being comprimised or tampered with...
has anyone ever heard of a situation that this has even happened in?
|
|
|
07-12-2006, 04:27 PM
|
#158
|
|
Maximum Bitrate
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 551
|
Quote: Originally Posted by phc
Nope. I use WPA. WPA is not crackable.
WEP was a poor implementation of a solid crypto idea and therefore is crackable.
WPA is good implementation of a solid crypto idea only vunerable via brute force (would take hundred's of centuries or more) or via password guessing. WPA uses RC4 encryption in addition to TKIP (keys change over time). WPA2 uses AES - encryption used for government "Top Secret" applicaitons.
My password is generated randomonly based on this perfect password generator and additional shuffeling of bits on my end.
https://www.grc.com/passwords.htm.
So you basically end up with random password that is 256 bits - so you end up with 1x10^77 possible passwords.
My wifi router uses open-source firmware, therefore no back-doors.
Like I said, my wifi is encrypted and un-crackable.
WPA is crackable, just not as fast as WEP.
http://www.wirelessdefence.org/Conte...WPAttyMain.htm
As far as people actually getting caught doing it. Oops, missed the part about an individual. Most people wouldn't even report it.
http://www.channel3000.com/technolog...65/detail.html
http://www.securityfocus.com/news/8835
__________________
Failure is not an option....
It's installed by default on every version of Windows.
Last edited by BarryWoods; 07-12-2006 at 04:32 PM.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored links
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
07-12-2006, 05:27 PM
|
#159
|
|
Variable Bitrate
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 299
|
Quote: Originally Posted by BarryWoods
WPA is crackable, just not as fast as WEP.
Its not a crack, coWPAtty is a dictionary attack on the pre shared key, as I mentioned above. A weak key will always be vulernable to dictionary attacks.
My PSK is a purely random 256 bit password, resulting in over 1x10^77 possible passwords. Lets say you could test my wifi with 100,000 passwords per second (not sure what it really is), you would exhaust the possibilities in 3.66x10^64 years.
The english dictionary has about 60,000 words. You can find password dictionarys with 150,000+ unique words, but it doesn't compare to a 256 bit random password.
|
|
|
07-12-2006, 07:43 PM
|
#160
|
|
Maximum Bitrate
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 551
|
Quote: Originally Posted by phc
Its not a crack, coWPAtty is a dictionary attack on the pre shared key, as I mentioned above. A weak key will always be vulernable to dictionary attacks.
My PSK is a purely random 256 bit password, resulting in over 1x10^77 possible passwords. Lets say you could test my wifi with 100,000 passwords per second (not sure what it really is), you would exhaust the possibilities in 3.66x10^64 years.
The english dictionary has about 60,000 words. You can find password dictionarys with 150,000+ unique words, but it doesn't compare to a 256 bit random password.
Hey, I did say it wasn't as fast as WEP!  You're in a very small minority of people who actually use non dictionary words. You must have edited your post the same time I replied, I didn't see that part when I hit reply. Then I had to run off and do some more work.
__________________
Failure is not an option....
It's installed by default on every version of Windows.
|
|
|
07-14-2006, 12:53 AM
|
#161
|
|
FLAC
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 943
|
Long responses and didn't read it all but
If you see an open door and you walk in the house, that's breaking an entering, your arrested.
You whip out your laptop and connect to someone's open 802.11g, is that the same? No. The technology is there and if a home user is dumb enough to plug and play his $50 router without doing some security passwords on it then it's his own problem.
I mean they created the writeable dvds at some point and people copy dvds all the time. Do you blame the person or the companies who created the technology to make such acts possible?
I personally am not that honest so I'll loose very little sleep from using someones wireless connection.
__________________
Mine needs to be updated.
|
|
|
07-14-2006, 01:17 AM
|
#162
|
|
Maximum Bitrate
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 551
|
Quote: Originally Posted by samc
Long responses and didn't read it all but
If you see an open door and you walk in the house, that's breaking an entering, your arrested.
You whip out your laptop and connect to someone's open 802.11g, is that the same? No. The technology is there and if a home user is dumb enough to plug and play his $50 router without doing some security passwords on it then it's his own problem.
I mean they created the writeable dvds at some point and people copy dvds all the time. Do you blame the person or the companies who created the technology to make such acts possible?
I personally am not that honest so I'll loose very little sleep from using someones wireless connection.
You walk into my house and your dead. If the 300lb plus of dogs don't get you I will. Locks and encryption keep the honest people honest. Everybody else are just freaking thieves.
Yes.
__________________
Failure is not an option....
It's installed by default on every version of Windows.
|
|
|
07-14-2006, 02:11 AM
|
#163
|
|
FLAC
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 943
|
Relax yourself cowboy, don't try to e-flex your muscles by saying your going to beef down an intruder when in fact you'll be hiding in the corner crying like a girl.
The technology is made, if "they" (term used loosely) didn't want you to use someone's connection why invent a wireless router, why invent a wireless card, why invent a computer?
You haven't ever copied a dvd, recorded a tv show on a vcr tape or installed an illegal copy of a program into your computer? Ofcourse you have, and yes all are illegal but it's a fact of life. Technology exists so these types of things won't stop.
If you don't want your wireless connection breached then properly secure it, simple right?
__________________
Mine needs to be updated.
|
|
|
07-14-2006, 03:03 AM
|
#164
|
|
Maximum Bitrate
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 551
|
Quote: Originally Posted by samc
Relax yourself cowboy, don't try to e-flex your muscles by saying your going to beef down an intruder when in fact you'll be hiding in the corner crying like a girl.
The technology is made, if "they" (term used loosely) didn't want you to use someone's connection why invent a wireless router, why invent a wireless card, why invent a computer?
You haven't ever copied a dvd, recorded a tv show on a vcr tape or installed an illegal copy of a program into your computer? Ofcourse you have, and yes all are illegal but it's a fact of life. Technology exists so these types of things won't stop.
If you don't want your wireless connection breached then properly secure it, simple right?
Last time I checked recording broadcast tv was leagle. Though I don't own a vcr anymore, my wife does record stuff on the pvr.
I own all my software thank-you.
Who said anything about "beefing" down an intruder, I'll shoot the bastard.
__________________
Failure is not an option....
It's installed by default on every version of Windows.
|
|
|
07-14-2006, 03:07 AM
|
#165
|
|
FLAC
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Anoka County, MN
Posts: 1,021
|
samc, you commit the slippery slope falacy by making those deductions and reasons. All of your statments are your opinions (and i disagree with most of them), and because they are opinions you can not state the end assertion as fact.
logic class ftw.
Quote:
# In the contexts of debate or of rhetoric, the phrase slippery slope, also appearing as the thin end of the wedge or the camel's nose, refers both to an argument about the likelihood of one event given another, and to a fallacy about the inevitability of one event given another. Invoking the "slippery slope" means predicting that one step in a process is likely to lead to a second (generally undesirable) step.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slope
Last edited by PURDooM; 07-14-2006 at 03:10 AM.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored links
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:54 AM.
| |