|
 |
|
06-20-2006, 04:03 PM
|
#121
|
|
Self proclaimed spoon feeder
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,658
|
Well, there it is... currently legislated at a state level and at least in some states accessing a network is not legal.
__________________
TruckinMP3
D201GLY2, DC-DC power, 3.5 inch SATA
Yes, you should search... and Yes, It has been covered before!
Read the FAQ!
|
|
|
|
Sponsored links
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
06-20-2006, 05:49 PM
|
#122
|
|
FLAC
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: SOCAL
Posts: 1,139
|
Oh god who gives a ****........
Wardrive on!
|
|
|
06-20-2006, 07:13 PM
|
#123
|
|
Confusion Master
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: If you go down to the woods today, You're sure of
Posts: 11,935
|
how about drive-by wardriving?
ie play HL2 whilst driving via wireless networks?
|
|
|
06-21-2006, 02:45 AM
|
#124
|
|
Maximum Bitrate
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 551
|
Like I said three pages back, wardriving isn't illegal. It's when you connect. Maybe they should change it to is connecting legal. I just want to see what the armchair lawyer says.
__________________
Failure is not an option....
It's installed by default on every version of Windows.
|
|
|
06-23-2006, 06:33 AM
|
#125
|
|
Variable Bitrate
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 355
|
what people can't see won't hurt them.. remember a good hacker gets in, snoops around and leaves without changing anything. An evil one will login and change the router password
__________________
CAR INFO HERE
"He who dies with the most toys, wins".
|
|
|
06-23-2006, 11:54 AM
|
#126
|
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 7
|
It's illegal
I was a cop in Conecticut, and now work in Florida. I can tell you that in both states, it is illegal.
This if from the current Florida State statutes:
Quote: Originally Posted by Florida State Statutes
815.06 Offenses against computer users.--
(1) Whoever willfully, knowingly, and without authorization:
(a) Accesses or causes to be accessed any computer, computer system, or computer network
I know most other states have similar statutes. However in today's day and age, we are swamped with fraud, and have little time to worry about people tapping in to unsecured wifi networks.
And before I get negative emails from everyone, I am NOT a traffic cop, I do internet fraud investigations - ebay scams and such. I hate motors cops and speeding tickets too.
Last edited by tienuts; 06-23-2006 at 11:59 AM.
|
|
|
06-23-2006, 12:20 PM
|
#127
|
|
Self proclaimed spoon feeder
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,658
|
Barry, I understand the distinction you are making. Detecting the signal... no real issue.
But Connecting with out permission is not OK. Does not matter is you have an impact or leave no changes. Checking email or directions is connecting.
If the intent of the connection is for the benefit of customers (starbucks and others) probably no big deal either.
This is not the case for other wireless connections residential or business.
__________________
TruckinMP3
D201GLY2, DC-DC power, 3.5 inch SATA
Yes, you should search... and Yes, It has been covered before!
Read the FAQ!
|
|
|
06-25-2006, 07:58 PM
|
#128
|
|
Calm Down Or Get A 2 Week Vacation -Love The Forum Policeman
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,604
|
Quote: Originally Posted by tienuts
I was a cop in Conecticut, and now work in Florida. I can tell you that in both states, it is illegal.
This if from the current Florida State statutes:
I know most other states have similar statutes. However in today's day and age, we are swamped with fraud, and have little time to worry about people tapping in to unsecured wifi networks.
And before I get negative emails from everyone, I am NOT a traffic cop, I do internet fraud investigations - ebay scams and such. I hate motors cops and speeding tickets too.
Have you ever heard of anyone being convicted, or even prosecuted under that law for connecting? I tend to think that law is more of an anti hacking statute. Leave the host system/computer alone and you will be fine, even if you are surfing the web, checking e-mail, whatever. Also, do you know where in the statute they define the various terms such as computer system, network etc...
As for the AK law, that is a lot of stuff to dissect, and I have little time. But again, I ask the same questions, any convictions, prosecution? I tend to think it is an ANTI HACKING statute, that would not be applied to taking some bandwisth.
Michael
__________________
...I love the French language...especially to curse with...Nom de Dieu de putain de bordel de merde de saloperies de connards d'enculés de ta mère. You see, it's like wiping your *** with silk, I love it.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored links
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
06-25-2006, 08:12 PM
|
#129
|
|
Maximum Bitrate
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 520
|
|
|
|
06-25-2006, 08:19 PM
|
#130
|
|
Calm Down Or Get A 2 Week Vacation -Love The Forum Policeman
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,604
|
Quote: Originally Posted by Silentbob343
Being arrested and prosecuted are VERY DIFFERENT THINGS. On top of that, he was arrested for theft of services, which is not along the lines of the statutes previously quoted.
There is a reason why "The sheriff's office and prosecutors are now reviewing the case." Cause this probably isn't theft of services (can you steal something that is free), and there are no other laws that he broke.
I can almost assure you he won't bve tried or convicted for the theft of services.
Michael
__________________
...I love the French language...especially to curse with...Nom de Dieu de putain de bordel de merde de saloperies de connards d'enculés de ta mère. You see, it's like wiping your *** with silk, I love it.
|
|
|
06-26-2006, 02:19 AM
|
#131
|
|
Maximum Bitrate
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 551
|
Quote: Originally Posted by Wiredwrx
Have you ever heard of anyone being convicted, or even prosecuted under that law for connecting? I tend to think that law is more of an anti hacking statute. Leave the host system/computer alone and you will be fine, even if you are surfing the web, checking e-mail, whatever. Also, do you know where in the statute they define the various terms such as computer system, network etc...
As for the AK law, that is a lot of stuff to dissect, and I have little time. But again, I ask the same questions, any convictions, prosecution? I tend to think it is an ANTI HACKING statute, that would not be applied to taking some bandwisth.
Michael
A network is a network. It doesn't matter if it's copper, glass, or microwaves. You're still connecting to a network, even to "just surf the net".
http://rrstar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/arti...103230036/1011
http://management.silicon.com/govern...9150672,00.htm
http://www.cybercrimelaw.org/blog/28...r%20fined.html
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060323-6447.html
http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,122153,00.asp
__________________
Failure is not an option....
It's installed by default on every version of Windows.
|
|
|
06-26-2006, 02:47 AM
|
#132
|
|
Maximum Bitrate
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 520
|
Quote: Originally Posted by Wiredwrx
Being arrested and prosecuted are VERY DIFFERENT THINGS. On top of that, he was arrested for theft of services, which is not along the lines of the statutes previously quoted.
There is a reason why "The sheriff's office and prosecutors are now reviewing the case." Cause this probably isn't theft of services (can you steal something that is free), and there are no other laws that he broke.
I can almost assure you he won't bve tried or convicted for the theft of services.
Michael
I was already aware of those points when I posted the link, but still it's food for thought. The more instances of this, the closer we come to having laws that regulate such activity. I like the caps, they really do help drive the point home.
|
|
|
06-27-2006, 01:58 PM
|
#133
|
|
Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 54
|
I'm not sure if this has been mentioned, dont have time to go through 9 pages, but in the UK a few people have been prosecuted (fined in the end) for bandwidth theft by accessing their neighbours wireless router that wasnt secure and using it so they didnt have to pay for an internet connection. I guess using APs for this use would therefore be considered illegal in the UK? Shame
|
|
|
06-27-2006, 11:20 PM
|
#134
|
|
Maximum Bitrate
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 551
|
Yea, those mean old isp's. They should just give it away. Then they'd all go under and then no one would have internet.
__________________
Failure is not an option....
It's installed by default on every version of Windows.
|
|
|
06-28-2006, 06:04 AM
|
#135
|
|
Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 54
|
Not really, no-one does all their surfing from their car now do they? Even if i could get free connections at certain locations (itd be nice at the beach so i cant get realtime weather reports) I'd still pay for it at home happily.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored links
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:02 PM.
| |