Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Resume from Hibernation PAINFULLY slow... (but on only one of two OS's)

  1. #1
    FLAC Nola111's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    New Orleans, LA
    Posts
    1,197

    Resume from Hibernation PAINFULLY slow... (but on only one of two OS's)

    Hi all,

    So I have a dual-boot setup on my pc... it's a laptop running XP SP2 on one partition and Vista Ultimate on the other.

    I spent a whole day doing tweaks to get this sucker to boot as fast as possible without having to go the way of a mini OS (TinyXP etc). I'm very happy with the results of a cold boot... going into both Vista or XP, it's fast.

    Hibernation is strange though. In Vista, resume from hibernation is super fast. No complaints. But resume from hibernation in XP, is SOOOOO SLOOOOOW. The main thing I'm running on either partition is Streetdeck, but that doesn't really matter because I close all programs before hibernating anyway. So either way I'm resuming to the desktop with no apps running.

    So I'm using identical hardware, but Vista resumes from hibernation in about 7 secs, where XP takes about a minute!!

    Any ideas on that? Even if I can't figure out what the big difference is between XP and Vista, I'd really just like to get XP to resume faster. Any tips?

    Thanks.

    PS - does my paging file size (virtual ram) have any effect on resume speed?

  2. #2
    FLAC Chairboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,380
    The only thing that matters is physical RAM. The more RAM you have, the longer it takes. If Vista takes 7 seconds, it probably isn't Hibernate, it's probably Standby (which consumes power, be careful).
    Chrysler 300 - Fabricating
    http://hallert.net/

  3. #3
    FLAC Nola111's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    New Orleans, LA
    Posts
    1,197
    Thanks for your reply. I do know the difference between Standby and Hibernate. I promise that it's hibernate on both OS's.

    I thought about doing a little webvideo showing the two different OS's resuming from hibernate, but then I figured out as I was doing it that it was completely unnecessary and I think people will know what I'm experiencing from reading my post.

    So physical RAM is the only RAM that matters... ok, because I adjusted down my virtual RAM to save a little room on my harddrive. I don't think it would affect the resume time THAT much though.

    The only other thing that I remembered after my post is about the Readyboost function of Vista. I have a 1GB USB drive connected which Vista uses as a readyboost drive (for those unfamiliar, Vista can use a USB drive to act similarly to the virtual ram pagefile in previous versions of WIndows). It's entirely possible that the Readyboost function is helping the resume from hibernate speed in Vista.

Similar Threads

  1. SD crashes unexpectedly after resume from hibernation.
    By parksgm in forum StreetDeck Bug Reports
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-13-2007, 10:32 AM
  2. Resume time from hibernation with EPIA M/B's
    By toxsickcity in forum Software & Software Development
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-22-2005, 12:32 AM
  3. resume music after hibernation
    By Dave_Perth in forum Road Runner
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-18-2005, 04:12 AM
  4. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-11-2005, 01:00 PM
  5. Problem with interrupted resume from hibernation with XP
    By Mastiff in forum General MP3Car Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-25-2005, 04:46 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •