Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Windows Vista Beta... sleep?

  1. #1
    Constant Bitrate
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Plano/College Station, TX
    Posts
    183

    Windows Vista Beta... sleep?

    The Windows Vista Beta version is available for download. It says there is a new feature called sleep which allows it to resume in 2-3 seconds like standby, but it uses the low power consumption of hibernate... anyone else seen this? Would it work with a program like Centrafuse?

  2. #2
    Neither darque nor pervert DarquePervert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Elsewhere
    Posts
    13,949
    Hibernation doesn't have lower power consumption.. It has ZERO power consumption. It writes the entire system state from RAM to a file on the hard drive.
    You're thinking of Standby (or Suspend to RAM) which does require power to keep the contents of memory.

    Now, Vista may be doing something entirely new and different... I don't know...
    Perhaps you have some resources you could link to to show the rest of us?
    Have you looked in the FAQ yet?
    How about the Wiki?



    Under normal circumstances, a signature would go here.

  3. #3
    Variable Bitrate
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Slovenia (EU)
    Posts
    312
    I mean it is HHD. These are Hybrid Hard Drives and have a flash ram inside, so when you put PC into sleep mode it saves RAM in disk but on the flash part, so it is faster than hibernate.

  4. #4
    Variable Bitrate
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    335
    What he is refering to is the ability for Vista to use flash drives as ram. These reason it would use less power than the current standby (which stores state data in RAM) is that is can write to the flash ram, which requires no power to hold data (it's non-volitale).

    Hope this helps. I may do some testing of Vista on my carPC once it is installed. I have to do Vista testing at work anyways, so might as well bring my work home with me...
    ~Puff

    View my worklog... I dare you... http://www.mp3car.com/vbulletin/worklogs/77267-2003-audi-a4-worklog-puffs-ride.html

    Carputer Progress [||------------------] 10%

  5. #5
    Low Bitrate
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    St. Asaph, UK
    Posts
    100
    vista is quite stable... i've had it running in my office since january

    release date for companys is november

    and xmas for consumers

    i will be loading whatever vista is current on my car pc in sept when i build it
    2001 Passat 130TDi Sport - Via Epia 15000, 1gb, 100gb, 220w psu, 7" lilliput motorized touch (chopped and in dash as a fixed), bluetooth, bu-303 gps, 7 port usb hub, tiny keyboard, netgear 54mb wifi, optima yellow top, ryder rt1170x, freecom dvb

  6. #6
    Maximum Bitrate
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Seattleish, WA
    Posts
    823
    Beware that Vista will eat your graphics controller alive. If you're looking for all the new look & feel, then you'll need a very strong graphics controller.

    Many of the devs around "here" can't run Vista in it's full glory... There was quite a surge at the local BestBuy/CompUSA/Circuit City to buy new adapters as the releases came out.

    The good news is that Vista will only activate what it thinks your adapter can handle. You can get a decent idea of what will & won't be active by first running the Advisor:

    http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvist...r/default.mspx


    Something to keep in mind is that _regardless of what MS claims_ Vista wants memory, and a lot of it. "Will it run in 256meg"? Yeah, if you like 20 minute logons. 512 is only "okay". We have 3Ghz machines here with 1 gig in them and it's doggy at times. the 2gb machines are much better.

    Vista also likes to be on disk... You should be running a fast drive with a large onboard cache for best performance. Being able to put the swap file on a different IDE _controller_ (not "channel") is ideal.

    These recommendations aren't anything new for Windows OS's... But not folllowing them is much more apparent in Vista.


    Oh... I think we all know about the issues around USB reconections after Sleep or Standby? I've seen Vista HANG trying to deal with certain devices when waking up. Your mileage may vary, tester beware, remember it's still "Beta".

    And... It's a 4GIG download and will look for 15GIG to install into. Make sure you have disk space handy.
    :: Mark

  7. #7
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    3
    Yeah I run Vista at home and it's a beast on the graphics but ram wise it doesn't use up much more then XP IMHO.

  8. #8
    Maximum Bitrate
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Seattleish, WA
    Posts
    823
    Quote Originally Posted by WRXERROR View Post
    Yeah I run Vista at home and it's a beast on the graphics but ram wise it doesn't use up much more then XP IMHO.
    Given that this thread is 4 months old and thus the info may be out of date - what build do you have at home?
    :: Mark

  9. #9
    Variable Bitrate
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Pomona, CA
    Posts
    340
    I test Vista at MS and I dunno if I would use anything other than the most recent beta - RC2 or just wait until it comes out. Either way, I wouldn't install it in your car unless you have a pretty current and expensive setup (CPU, ram and graphics wise).
    Carputer Progress:

    Re-do fabrication of screen [DONE]
    Add mini-USB and micro-USB power from M2-ATX [DONE]
    Teardown PC [100%]
    Add HDMI > VGA converter [0%]

  10. #10
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by midiwall View Post
    Given that this thread is 4 months old and thus the info may be out of date - what build do you have at home?
    Wow I normally notice the dates of threads but I missed it on this one.
    I'm using RC2 5600 at home. It's as solid as any version of XP I have used. Media Player is still screwy but I heard they mixed the issues with it. I just haven't updated to the new release yet.


    Quote Originally Posted by fatejd View Post
    I test Vista at MS and I dunno if I would use anything other than the most recent beta - RC2 or just wait until it comes out. Either way, I wouldn't install it in your car unless you have a pretty current and expensive setup (CPU, ram and graphics wise).
    I agree. While you "could" get it running on your average CarPC it's not going to run well IMHO. My home system is beefy enough to handle Vista but even then Vista could bring it to it's knees turning on alot of things. It's the OS of the future and really built to run on systems of the future. I guess MS is finally planning ahead of time for once.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. How to: Change windows shell
    By IntellaWorks in forum WinNT Based
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 04-12-2012, 07:29 PM
  2. Replies: 33
    Last Post: 05-07-2008, 09:24 PM
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-06-2006, 10:07 AM
  4. Bare essentials for bootup
    By Psychobiker in forum Operating System Optimization
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 01-05-2006, 04:08 PM
  5. Will leaving Windows in Standby drain battery?
    By slffl in forum Power Supplies
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 08-03-2004, 09:57 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •