I'm trying to transmit telemetry from a race car to a base station via
802.11. It's mostly wide open terrain, but the range need is ~0.5
mile, if I could get 1 mile I would be completely set for all tracks. Is it possible to achieve this via 802.11? I've seen 27dBm transmitters (http://www.quickertek.com/Quicky.php), 12-15 dB omnidirectional antennas, and amplifiers, but very scant info regarding the actual range achieved (because of variable conditions, etc). I can put a laptop (or even PC) in the race car, and put an omni antenna +/- amplifier if need be at both locations... but would it be enough? What do I really need?
Also, how close would I be to FCC limits? Does it matter if I use an amplifier vs an antenna for the limits? What ARE the limits? I hear 500mW, 100mW, 1W, 4W.....
Failure is not an option....
It's installed by default on every version of Windows.
HOWEVER, your question is like asking "how strong do I have to yell for someone to hear me 100 yards away" There is really no magic formula, though there are programs that will theoretiucally tell you the range coverage of a given tranmsitter, but they are expensive and difficult to use.
...I love the French language...especially to curse with...Nom de Dieu de putain de bordel de merde de saloperies de connards d'enculés de ta mère. You see, it's like wiping your *** with silk, I love it.
That's not true. We do it here at work all the time. It is called a link budget. The problem is you need to know all the limits of your equipment. You have a good start, here. It is done by converting everything to dB and simply adding. That is why RF engineers use dB's.
Here is an example:
power out = +27 dBm
cable loss from Tx to antenna (I'm guessing) = -3dB
Gain of Tx antenna = +15 dB
Path loss from antenna to Rx (1 mile) = -104.33 dB
Gain of Rx antenna (assuming identical antennas) = +15 dB
Cable loss from Rx antenna to Rx (estimate) = -3 dB
The rough total is -53.33 dB. This is the sensitivity required by the Rx. Actually -63.33 dB sensitivity would be preferred.
This is however an ideal situation. The higher the gain of your antennas the narrower the beamwidth, so it would be easier to lose signal with motions of either antenna. Also, there might be more losses due to polarization mismatch between the two antennas and any terrain or foliage, other cars or rain between the two antennas. The -104.33 value is for what they call free space, meaning what you would see in a vacuum or just air.
Make sure your antennas are oriented the same way, (i.e. vertical).
This is just a brief overview but good for an example. But you need to know the sensitivity of your Rx. I believe -53 dB is well within the sensitivity of most 2.4 systems, but so are lots of hills and trees on a racetrack.
Here is a site I have been looking into for the same reason. I want to be able to send location and status messages to and from a desert race truck. The 1 watt 900mhz has a max range of 40 miles line of sight at a max 115.2Kbps
Here is a real good resource on 802.11. http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/802do...pter/ch15.html
Also If you are a HAM radio operator, channels 1-3 are within the ham radio band. You can effectively use higher power( $$$$$$ at 1500 watts ) as long as you follow the ham radio rules on content and identification. http://www.ssbusa.com/m13amp.html
If It's Called Tourist Season, Why Can't We Hunt Them?
I Just Do What the Voices Inside My Head Tell Me to Do.
The Definition of an Upgrade: Take old bugs out, put new ones in.
Texas DOS: Y'all reckon? (Yep/Nope)